Answer:
9%
Explanation:
Given:
The net income = $12,000
Total equity = $40,000
Total assets = $80,000
Dividend payout ratio = 40%
Now,
Internal rate of return, r = ![\frac{\textup{Net Income}}{\textup{Total Equity}}\times100\%](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%5Ctextup%7BNet%20Income%7D%7D%7B%5Ctextup%7BTotal%20Equity%7D%7D%5Ctimes100%5C%25)
or
Internal rate of return, r = ![\frac{\textup{12,000}}{\textup{80,000}}\times100\%](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%5Ctextup%7B12%2C000%7D%7D%7B%5Ctextup%7B80%2C000%7D%7D%5Ctimes100%5C%25)
or
Internal rate of return, r = 15%
and,
Retention ratio = 1 - Dividend payout ratio
= 1 - 0.40
= 0.60 or 60%
Now,
Growth rate = Retention ratio × Internal rate of return
or
Growth rate = 0.60 × 0.15
or
Growth rate = 0.09
or
Growth rate = 9%
Answer:
D. Zeta prevails, but only if the assignment is signed and in writing
Explanation:
Zeta prevails but only if the assignment is in writing and is signed.
If the assignment is express thereby and is signed by the parties in contract , then zeta can demand the amount from willy. Without any written consent and permission , willy cannot enforce the payment to zeta.
This is the best option in this case .
The correct answer is A. A publisher prevents its employees from using office computers for personal use.
Explanation
Internal compliance is a set of strategic internal rules and measures focused on employee behavior and ethics. This internal Compliance was obtained with the aim of improving business practices aimed at raising the quality level of results, goals, and objectives. According to the above, the correct answer is "A. publisher prevents its employees from using office computers for personal use." because this is an example of a business rule that pre-empted the misuse of company equipment preventing its employees from using it for purposes other than corporate ones.
Answer: Option (c) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct Option: The corporate tax rate increases.
If there is an increase in the corporate tax rate then this will induce the firms to increase the amount of their debt. This is due to the fact that the firms with more debt are going to pay less tax because of the large interest expense. Due to large interest expenses, their income before tax reduces.
Hence, large corporate taxes encourage firms to increase the amount of debt. Therefore, the firms with no debt pays higher taxes than the firms with higher amount of debt.