1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lapatulllka [165]
3 years ago
11

A title is not considered transferred until the deed is actually delivered to and accepted by the grantee. The grantor must deli

ver the deed to the grantee personally.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Bas_tet [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

While a deed may be considered a formal document that proves ownership of a property, it may necessarily not means that a title is not considered transferred until the grantee accepts it. As long as a deed is legally delivered to the grantee or delivered to somebody who is acting on behalf of the grantee, then it is considered transferred.

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP MEE!!<br> Thank you!
Mazyrski [523]

Answer: cant see it

Explanation: i dont know

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Once you answer all of my questions correctly I will send you 500 points
Gelneren [198K]

1.  D. Northern

2. A. True

3. D. The prime minister officially apologized  on behalf of all Australians.

4. A. 2.5

5.  A. European diseases

5 0
3 years ago
How much money does the united states spend annually on foreign oil?
PSYCHO15rus [73]

$50 times 4 million barrels/day is $200 million/day which is $73 billion/year.

6 0
3 years ago
Name 3 things that were segregated during the Jim Crow era.
forsale [732]

Answer:

Water fountains, bathrooms, and resteraunts.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Why did the Supreme Court overturn the conviction of Ernesto Miranda in 1966? Explain the important change to the police arrest
sashaice [31]

The Supreme Court overturn the conviction of Ernesto Miranda in 1966 because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.

<h3>What was the conviction of Ernesto Miranda?</h3>

The case was related to Miranda who was found guilty of kidnapping and ra-pe and was sentenced to 20-30 years imprisonment on each count.

After the appeal of the case, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession, hence, it overturn the conviction of Ernesto Miranda in 1966 because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.

Read more about Ernesto Miranda

brainly.com/question/2039279

#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Why did European countries establish colonies in Africa during the 19th century?
    6·1 answer
  • Is it true that Queen Elizabeth II can break any laws ?
    10·2 answers
  • The unjust or cruel exercise of authority or power is
    14·2 answers
  • What do lines on a contour map indicate? A. degrees east and west of the equator B. elevation above sea level C. degrees north a
    9·2 answers
  • He served as an advisor for president jefferson
    13·1 answer
  • Five-year-old Tammy mistakenly believes that her short, wide glass contains less soda than her brother's tall, narrow glass. Act
    13·2 answers
  • I will give brainliest!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • Paglalapat ng kaalaman . Ibigay ang mahahalagang tungkulin ng konsul, mahistrado, censor at tatlong asemblea
    14·1 answer
  • Someone, please Help me
    11·1 answer
  • Which can make decisions over the use of international force to fulfill its purpose?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!