Answer: True
Explanation: The Supreme Court admitted that it is haphazard to treat similar things differently and that mandatory death penalty statutes eliminated this problem, but also reckless to treat two different things the same way. In essence, to impose the same penalty on all convicted murderers, even though all defendants
are different, is just as capricious as imposing a penalty randomly.
To relieve this problem, some sentencing guidelines became necessary. This gave rise to the guided discretion statutes that set standards for juries and judges to
use when deciding whether to impose the death penalty. The Court reasoned that, guided discretion statutes struck a reasonable balance between giving the jury some discretion and allowing it to consider the defendant's background and character and the circumstances surrounding the crime.
Answer:
Select specific target markets.
Explanation:
Management will investigate the capability of the organization in the last stage or fifth stage of the target market selection process, which is the "select specific target markets". In this stage, there are certain issues that must be resolved and they are;
1. Are there differences in the needs of customers valid to warrant using market segmentation?
2. Which segment should the organization participate?
3. And lastly, are the resources and skills needed to effectively compete in the target market available to the organization at the moment?
Answer:
Jo Ann Robinson
Needed to print and distribute thousands of leaflets to instruct African Americans to stop riding the bus
Taxi Drivers
Needed to drive African Americans to work since they couldn’t ride the bus while also dealing with police officers harassing them
All Boycotters
The inconveniences caused by not being able to take the bus and the urge to lash out in frustration
Explanation:
example answer on edmentum.
Answer:
See i don't know the answer for this question so sorry
Explanation:
The M'Naughten Rule is a set of instructions that juries are supposed to use to determine whether or not a defendant is criminally insane.
The base assumption with the rule is that all defendants are sane until proven otherwise.
The test comes out of a trial for a man who shot the Prime Minister's secretary.