I believe the answer is: <span>corporation
The magnitude of influence that a person has in influencing what actions should be taken by the corporation would be depended on the amount of shares which that person has. People with higher shares percentage tend to have more say in corporations' future decision.</span>
Answer:
The answer is supply partnership.
Explanation:
Supply chain partnership is an increasing tendency towards the development of long term relationships with suppliers. This can be achieve throught a variety of channels of wich the most common are:
-Sigle sourcing (buying from one supplier)
-Preferred supplier (limiting suppliers to certain organisations wich are then ranked)
-Strategics alliances (vallued-added partnerships in which risk and rewards are shared between the supplier and the costoumer)
In general, partnerships are sought with suppliers with outstanding performance, desirable/unique products, or technological advantage.
Option A
Supporters of multinational corporations (MNCs) might argue all of the following except that MNCs are more capital-intensive and highly mechanized rather than labor-intensive
<u>Explanation:</u>
MNC has grown the primary business of developing democracies. MNCs profit from the more economical operation expenses and privileges conferred by the administration of developing countries. These developing countries can further enlarge from the grant made by MNCs.
MNCs can support overcoming scarcity, stimulating commercial germination, building careers that employ confined people. Most utmost of the MNCs demands the benefit of developing countries. Notwithstanding, workers are compensated inexpensive payments, as there are some or no industry unions to defend their gains or concert with the MNCs.
A benefit of cohabitation is that the partners won't have to deal with pressure to marry.
<h3>What is Cohabitation?</h3>
- By defining each partner's rights and obligations, a cohabitation agreement can make the process of divorcing considerably easier.
- By doing this, the likelihood of disagreements over money and other specifics can be decreased, and any conflicts can be resolved amicably without resorting to legal action.
- Living together before getting married has the advantage of allowing one to get to know each other better, enhancing the ability to solve problems together, strengthening the bond, and enhancing the relationship's resilience to stress, all of which can give some more confidence in the decision to get married.
- Their inertia argument states that cohabitation, as opposed to dating without cohabitation, improves the likelihood of marriage, in part because there are more incentives to stay together once a couple starts living together.
To learn more about Cohabitation refer to:
brainly.com/question/12882310
#SPJ4
1.C
2.A
3.C
4.D I have to add more letters because the answer was to short lol
