Answer:
She should continue producing 20 wedding cakes a month.
Explanation:
From the information in the question
Revenue per unit= Total revenue/Units produced
Revenue per unit= 5000/20= $250
We were given the marginal cost as $200
So our revenue per month ($250) is higher than marginal cost ($200)
Yam is making a profit of $50, so she should continue producing 20 cakes per month
Answer:
disruptive
Explanation:
The term that is being described is known as a disruptive innovation. In the context of business theory, this term refers to an innovation that creates an entirely new market and value network which ultimately disrupts the old market and value network, while at the same time taking over market-leading firms, products, and alliances. One example of this are Smartphones which disrupted laptops as the primary way consumers use the internet in today's world.
Answer: Spaghetti map
Explanation:
A spaghetti map refers to as a visual representation that makes use of a continuous flow line that's used in the tracing of an activity for a particular process.
Since the people and equipment were not optimally positioned, the process map that would best help the team address this issue is the spaghetti map. It's vital as it helps in identification of workflow redundancies.
He may be liable for<u> "damages, fines, or imprisonment."</u>
Copyright law does not contain any proviso that enables unapproved gatherings to make individual duplicates of copyrighted items. Be that as it may, under the teaching of "reasonable utilize," people might be allowed to make reinforcement duplicates or authentic duplicates of a few materials as long as specific conditions are met. Making a duplicate of a copyrighted work for your very own usability is probably going to be considered copyright encroachment. Be that as it may, on the off chance that you are making a duplicate so you may utilize a copyrighted item on the off chance that the first is stolen, harmed or devastated, your direct may fall inside the teaching of reasonable utilize.
<span>the four-firm concentration ratio in the u.s. soda market in 2009 are as follows
Coca cola -42.7%
Pepsi - 30.8%
Dr.pepper snapple group - 15.3 %
Royal crown - 2.1 %
From the above data we can clearly find that Coke has an uphill battle—they have huge amounts of marketing muscle, financial resources.Against Coke and Pepsi, guerrilla warfare is the only thing that might work.</span>
