Answer:
The correct answer is D.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Annual deposit= 5,000*1.25= $6,250
n= 35 years
i= 0.08 annual
To calculate the future value of the retirement plan, we need to use the following formula:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
FV= {6,250*[(1.08^35)-1]}/0.08= }$1,076,980.02
Answer:
5
Explanation:
The formula to compute the interest coverage ratio is shown below:
= (Earning before tax + interest expense) ÷ (interest expense)
where,
Earning before tax equal to
= Net income ÷ (1 - tax rate)
= $120 ÷ (1 - 0.40)
= $200
And interest expense is $50
So, the interest coverage ratio equal to
= ($200 + $50) ÷ ($50)
= 5
Answer:
The correct options are "A, C, and D".
Explanation:
- GAAP becomes regarded as a relatively 'rules-based' management framework, seems to be the accounting technique used throughout the United States
- IFRS becomes quite 'principles-based', although this would be the accounting framework used in more than 110 countries throughout the globe.
- These allow the same approach being used for international and domestic section reporting, which generate reconciliation issues.
Answer:
$58,002.60
Explanation:
First, it is clear to include the $21,000 as part of the value of the equipment.
Now, the $9,000 annual payment after every year for six years need to be presented in its present value, meaning what is the value of those future amounts of $9,000 on June 30, 2018.
To calculate the present value of annuity (annuity means constant and equal payments) for those 6 payments of $9,000, we would need the Present Value Factor which is supplied from the Present Value Table.
Looking at 12% for 6 periods ("six annual installments") on the table, it gives the PV factor of 4.1114.
Just multiply $9,000 by 4.1114 and we get 37,002.60
Finally add the downpayment of $21,000 with the present value $37,002.60 and we would get the total value of the equipment of 58,002.60
Answer:
The correct answer would be option A, The lump sum is always better.
Explanation:
If I would have to give advice to my friend who is in the same situation as i was in some time back, I would recommend him to go for the Lump sum choice. This is because of the fact that the interest rate compounded in three years payment schedule will result in the less value of what I am getting today. Accepting the lump sum value in contrast with accepting the yearly payments on 9% interest rate would be better off because it has more value at present.
