The price elasticity of a good will tend to be larger if the fewer number of substitute goods will be available.
The cross elasticity of demand for substitute goods is always positive because the demand of one good increases at the time when the price for the substitute good increases however the cross elasticity of demand for complementary goods is always negative.
For example, if the price of coffee rises, the quantity demanded for tea which is the best substitute of coffee beverage will increase as consumers will switch to a less expensive but the substitutable alternative.
This is reflected in the cross elasticity of the demand formula, as both the numerator which is the percentage change in the demand of tea and denominator which is the price of coffee shows a positive increase.
To know more about price elasticity of demand here:
brainly.com/question/13565779
#SPJ4
Answer:
Demographic Environment
Explanation:
When looking at the macroenvironmet and the likely changes happening in there, one seems to look at the broader condition of the economy which can be impacted by the monetary and fiscal policies, as well as employment and inflation rates.
The demographic environment is part of the six forces of the microenvironment and should be considered first amongst the three items listed. With this, a company can be able to identify the exact target markets needed for their respective products or services
.
Answer:d. What do you think about the new ice-cream flavor
Explanation:
An open ended question is a statement that requires a response. The response can't be yes/ no or a static response
The question What do you think about the new ice-cream flavor can't be answered with yes or no. The answer can either be I like the ice cream flavour or I don't like the ice cream flavour.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
