Answer:
first-mover advantage
Explanation:
First-mover advantage refers to the strategic advantage achieved by the first company that occupies a market segment. In order for a company to gain first-mover advantage it must be the first company to enter a market or at least be the first company to gain competitive advantage in that market. 
Unidice is the first company to gain competitive advantage in the data system market because its processing speed is much higher than its competitors. 
Sometimes you don't need to be the first one to enter a market, but you need to be the first one to do things right. For example, Microsoft introduced the Surface tablet almost a decade before Apple introduced the iPad, but Apple did it right, therefore Apple gained first mover advantage. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
$22,500
Explanation:
KL Corp
Cash ($15×$10,000 85%) $127,500
Compensation expenses ($15×$10,000×15%) $22,500
Common stock ($15×$10,000) $150,000
Therefore KL will record compensation expense associated with the May purchases of $22,500
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
There will be no effect on working capital upon write off as the entries required would be a credit to receivables and a debit to allowance account.
Explanation:
The allowance account is the account used to record receivables due that may not be collectible.
When a company has determined that a receivable may be uncollectible, the company credits the allowance for receivables account and debits bad debit expense. This reduces the accounts receivable balance in the balance sheet as the receivables to be reported will be net the allowance given. As such, where on December 31, 2020, Allowance account balance includes $3,076 for a past due account that is not likely to be collected. 
There will be no effect on working capital upon write off as the entries required would be a credit to receivables and a debit to allowance account.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Explanation:
This is a complex issue that may reflect on the organizational culture of that company. As a leader, it is necessary to understand the situation and listen to both parties in order to find a favorable solution for the company and the employees. Since Marshall's work is important to the company, firing him at first may not be a favorable decision, what the leader can do is provide feedback to him about his interpersonal relationship at the company.
As an effective leader, it is necessary to constantly monitor the work and the relationship between employees, in which case it is necessary to understand the reason for Marshall's behavior and try to change the parameters and procedures that may be facilitating this behavior. It is necessary for him to understand that despite being an effective worker, the company is an integrated system that must be in perfect synchronicity for it to be successful in the market.
What the leader could do in this case then is to try to change the code of organizational ethics, seek training and psychological assistance for Marshall if necessary, talk to the workers who are part of the conflict to understand the situation in the best way, to seek a work redesign. , etc.
 
        
             
        
        
        
I belive this is Undervaluing asserts.
hope this helps!