Given the following syllogism:
No untalented bards are compelling writers,
So some uncompelling writers are not uninspired poets.
For some inspired poets are talented bards
A) After reducing the number of terms in the syllogim, what is the conclusion?
B) Major premise?
C) Minor Premise?
Answer:
A. All compelling writers are talented bards
B. Some inspired poets are talented bards
C. Some inspired poets are not compelling writers
Explanation:
Syllogism is a term in philosophy that describes logical conclusion, derived from deductive reasoning to obtain conclusion on the premises of two or more proposition, which is considered to be true.
Hence, in this case, the conclusion of this syllogism is that, All compelling writers are talented bards
While the major premise, which is supported by two premises is - Some inspired poets are talented bards
The minor premise is - Some inspired poets are not compelling writers
