Galarza compares the words to trapezes in full swing to explain that the harder words made no sense to him.
<h3>What is the comparison for?</h3>
It can be compared to metaphor because it was used by Galarza to explain that he does not understand a word.
Hence, he compared the words to trapezes in full swing to explain that the harder words made no sense to him.
Read more about comparison
<em>brainly.com/question/1404938</em>
#SPJ1
The answer to this question is:
<span>Why must every proposition in an argument be tested using a logical sequence?
</span>"to discover if it makes logical sense"
Hoped This Helped, <span>
Calderonsairasov445o
Your Welcome :) </span>
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
The statement here is a plain sentence without any logical backing or support.
For any argument to be reasonable or adequate, three factors are essential
a) Definition
b) Deductive reasoning
c) Inductive reasoning.
The given statement has a valid sentence but does not have any logical support (though it is correct)
Hence, option A is correct
