The onion model, which elaborates on social penetration as a process by which people "peel back" layers of personal knowledge about others through interpersonal interaction to reach the core, is a good metaphor for explaining how social penetration theory functions.
To learn about someone's "core self," or the most private aspects of that person takes time. The surface of a person that is visible to many others is their public image. The innermost parts of a person, known only to close relationships through disclosure over time, constitute the private self.
The surface, medium, inner, and core personality layers are only a few of the levels that are described by the social penetration hypothesis. Rather superficial information, like preferences for certain types of music and clothing, makes up the superficial layers. In computer-mediated communication contexts like online dating and virtual teams, the theory has also been applied.
To learn more about the social penetration theory:
brainly.com/question/13615011
#SPJ4
The answer is " B - Democratization "
Answer: Tax Cuts and Tax Rebates
Explanation:
Having more cash means companies have the resources to procure capital, improve technology, grow, and expand. All of these actions increase productivity, which grows the economy. A country may be wealthy, and powerful, but if its citizens live short or unhappy lives, Wealth is important only in so far as it encourages greater well-being. Invest in technology, human capital, and physical capital. Provide incentives of a market-oriented economic context. Work to reduce government economic controls on market activities. Deregulate the banking and financial sector. Reduce protectionist policies.
Answer: FALSE
Explanation: The garden of Eden style of thinking is mythological style of thinking: people who believes that things not seen and has no prove of trace, has actually existed.
For someone to be skeptical means the person doesn't accept information easily, such person will always want to verify the information by asking more questions, so he can understand how the information is interrelated with the fact known.
This means that if a person rejects the mythological view of the garden of Eden, it is not certain that such person is highly skeptical, because such person may accept the mythological view of the existence of heaven and hell. Such person may only be skeptical about one thing and may not be skeptical about another thing, this means the person is not highly skeptical.
