For independence because Britain was taxing the colonists too much, was passing too many acts oppressing the colonists, and even killed some colonists (Boston Massacre).
Well, once the Americas were discovered and the colonist found that the soil was agreeable to grow different crops such as tobacco and cotton the colonists realized that they needed people to pick the crops. Originally indentured servants did the hard labor but then when they found that they could get labor by trading goods with African tribal leaders they resorted to importing Africans to the Americas as labor. The tribes in Africa were constantly fighting and whichever side won the losers became the slaves of the winning tribe. However, as Europeans brought valuable things to the continent of Africa such as weapons, salt, gold, and other things the leaders of the winning tribe would give their slaves to the Europeans. There were cases when Blacks captured other Blacks in Africa for the sole purpose of giving them to the European traders. Hopefully this helps. If you haven't see the movie La Amistad, it will explain in more detail what I have written. I learned a lot from that movie. I must warn you the first 5 to 10 minutes are a bit gory. I had a hard time watching that part.
See below
Explanation:
Common Sense challenged the British government at the time and tried to persuade the common people in the colonies to fight for egalitarian government.
It is known as the Fairness Doctrine. The improvement of the communicate media brought beginning turmoil basically in light of the fact that close-by stations frequently utilized the same or contiguous radio frequencies, meddling with each other's communicates. Congress passed the Communications Act, which managed broadcasting and made the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to direct the procedure. Supporters must be authorized, and in light of the fact that the quantity of frequencies is constrained, permitting required political unbiasedness. The Communications Act additionally contained an "equivalent time" arrangement, which restricts supporters from offering or offering broadcast appointment to a political applicant without offering to offer or give an equivalent measure of broadcast appointment to different contender for a similar office.
