1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeka57 [31]
3 years ago
9

What inherent right did the members of the assembly believe the Stamp Act went against?

History
1 answer:
Nina [5.8K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The right of representation in the same body which exercises the power of taxation

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did the judiciary act of 1789 affect the supreme court
Yanka [14]
<span>The Judiciary Act of 1789, also known as the 1789 Judiciary Act, officially titled, “An Act to Establish the Judicial Courts of the United States. The Act basically established the federal court system of the United States of America because it was only sketched in general terms in the U.S. Constitution. <span>

The act divided the federal court system into a three-part judiciary --- district courts, circuit courts, and Supreme Court. It also outlined the exact roles of these courts in the system. </span></span> <span> </span>
5 0
2 years ago
In the early 1900s, Al Capone was a​
likoan [24]

Answer: Firefighter

Explanation:

Hope this helped!! :D

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Chapter 7 As long as the grass grows or water runs summary
Tanya [424]
What? wheres ur question lol
3 0
3 years ago
In the 1800s, the Irish population of New York increased because of the_____________________(5), so there were more St Patrick’s
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer: Unfortunate economic situations and famines in Ireland.

Explanation:

The Irish community represents one of the most significant and most numerous cities in the United States. The mass emigration of Irish in the united states began in the early nineteenth century and intensified throughout the century. The reason for these circumstances was the fact that there was a great famine in Ireland and that people were massively emigrating to America, especially New York, in search of a better life.

5 0
3 years ago
After U.S.-led invasions in the early 2000s, Afghanistan and Iraq changed from dictatorships to democracies. Is it right to spre
rodikova [14]

Answer:

Although the United States intervened in Iraq after it began its intervention in Afghanistan, it is withdrawing from Iraq first. Therefore, what the United States has and has not accomplished in Iraq will be discussed first.

It must be said to begin with that the United States did achieve some important successes in Iraq. It destroyed the brutal regime of Saddam Hussein — something that the Iraqi population had not only been unable to do on its own, but may not have been able to do later either. If Saddam had managed to transfer power to his sons (who were reportedly just as, or even more, vicious than their father), the regime may have survived for years or even decades.

In addition, the U.S.-led intervention helped the Kurds in northern Iraq. They had suffered terribly under Saddam Hussein but were able to solidify the tenuous autonomy they had achieved (also with U.S. help) after the 1990-91 Kuwait conflict and even build some prosperity in their zone.

Although Iraq’s Arab Sunni tribes were initially hostile to the U.S.-led intervention and fought an insurgent war against it, American forces were eventually able to make peace and work with most of them.

Most important, the United States organized and protected the holding of relatively free and fair elections at both the national and local levels. This allowed Iraq’s Arab Shia majority, which had also suffered dreadfully under Saddam Hussein, to play a leading role in Iraqi politics for the first time.

In addition to these successes, however, the United States has had some noteworthy failures in Iraq. First, the failure to halt the massive violence, looting and infrastructure breakdown that took place throughout the country immediately after the collapse of Saddam Hussein’s regime. This was caused by the Bush administration’s failure to anticipate and plan for the aftermath of Saddam’s downfall as well as to deploy enough troops to maintain order. As a result, the initial gratitude displayed by much of the Iraqi population toward the United States for delivering it from Saddam quickly disappeared.

Further, despite a massive troop presence, the United States was unable to prevent or stop the large-scale ethnic-cleansing campaigns that violent Arab Sunni and Arab Shia groups conducted against each other’s communities. These campaigns were so successful that some observers attributed the decline in violence in Iraq in 2008-09 not to the American troop surge ordered by President Bush, but to the ethnic-cleansing campaigns having largely completed the violent work of segregating the Sunni and the Shia communities from each other.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • When taking notes on your research, where would you place the following information? Gallo, Peter M. "Lake George Wildlife." Wor
    10·2 answers
  • during world war 2 about 1.8% of us soldiers were killed directly in battle this number went down to 0.5% at vietnam war what wa
    9·1 answer
  • Mixed-market economies have more private property, while command economies have more public property. Which is the best example
    8·2 answers
  • In Texas, cities adopted the____ Form of government to reduce the influence of corrupt officials.
    12·2 answers
  • Why did art from the Renaissance portray so many images of Jesus and other religious scenes from the Christian Bible?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help me! Use the word bank.
    11·1 answer
  • Why was it difficult to negotiate a fair treaty with native people?
    5·2 answers
  • Please help I’ll do 13 points
    7·1 answer
  • Which phrase best completes the diagram?
    10·2 answers
  • History question civil rights help:)
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!