Answer: yes; no
Explanation:
Price discrimination is an exploitative selling strategy that sellers use to try to charge their customers on different prices for the same product or service.
Last-minute "rush" tickets can be purchased for most Broadway theater shows at a discounted price. They are typically distributed via lottery or on a first-come, first-served basis a few hours before the show. Assume that the theater in question does not hold seats in reserve for this purpose, but rather offers rush tickets only for seats not sold before the day of the performance......... YES PRICE DISCRIMINATION OCCURS
---.>In this case, the groups are segmented into those who paid earlier at normal price and those who paid in relation to the rush at discounted price, A case price discrimination arises because the people who have paid more than others for a same show, would not be reserved seats which means that the product was same for the two type of consumers but not the same price
Horizon Wireless offers various features "à la carte" that a customer may add to his or her calling plan, such as a text messaging package, a data package, and an Internet package. NO PRICE DISCRIMINATION
---->This is because Because Horizon Wireless is offering the different features with a la carte pricing, where every customer is subject to the same pricing irrespective of his or her calling plan.
If the price of a data package or internet were different for a customer with a more expensive calling plan, then Horizon Wireless might be attempting to identify thier different consumer types and try to exploit the differences in their willingness to pay.
Answer:
<u>Unethical work behavior</u>
Explanation:
It is very unfortunate in many organization for such kind of scenarios to occur which could lead to dismissal from work if the gets to know about the attitude.
Remembering that no one will be pleased totally in workplace you will have to give people the benefit of the doubt by trusting them because If we all run around mistrusting others, we end up creating a miserably unhappy business culture.
Answer:
a) 28%
b) 56%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Operating profit margin = 7%
Asset turnover ratio = 4
Now,
a) ROA = Profit margin × Asset turnover ratio
= 7% × 4
= 28%
b) Given:
Debt-equity ratio = 1
Interest payments = $8,200
Taxes = $8,200
EBIT = $21,000
Now,
Total assets = Net income ÷ ROA
Also,
Net income = EBIT - tax - interest
= $21,000 - $8,200 - $8,200
= $4,600
Thus,
Total assets = $4,600 ÷ 28%
= $16428.57
also,
Total assets = Debt + Equity
or
Total assets = Equity × (
)
or
$16428.57 = Equity × ( 1 + 1 )
or
=> Equity = $8214.28
Therefore,
ROE = Net income ÷ Equity
= $4,600 ÷ $8214.28
= 56%
Answer:
The correct answer is option d.
Explanation:
The marginal benefit of another T-shirt is $15. The price of the T-shirt is $10.
The marginal cost is equal to the price, so it is also $10.
The marginal benefit earned from the T-shirt is greater than the marginal cost incurred on a T-shirt.
According to economic reasoning, it is profitable to buy another T-shirt. So, Mary will buy another T-shirt this month.
Commission For Gender Equality,South Africa's HIV/AIDS Battle Plan, Child Line South Africa, and Women and Children Violence Prevention Act are some organizations. You can research these and discuss them on your own.
