<h3>
Answer:</h3><h3>Mr.tonny mac</h3><h3>Miss.tonny mac</h3><h3>july 7 ,2020</h3><h3>Absent days from work </h3><h3>I'd like to inform about my absence from work next week since I will be out if the town for two days the next week and three days the following one after that, I will reincorporate to my regular schedule and activities.</h3><h3 />
Explanation:
I'm not sure what the question is here, but this is not true. While she was unhappy in her marriage to her husband because she did not feel as though she was free to live for herself, she was not going to ask for a divorce.
This is a relative clause. Adjective: "who finished the marathon" hope this helps!
Answer: Yes, If punishments were harsh enough, there would probably be no crime.
Explanation: If people who disobeyed the law were strongly punished, then it would be less likely that people would break the rules of the government. Less people would speed, and more people would probably start being more serious about it. For example, crimes like bank robberies would probably become less likely if they had to pay off all of the money they stole. Being punished for certain things could be harsher. If this happens, the amount of crime will probably decrease, but it will not completely disappear. This is why I think If punishments were harsh enough, there would be no crime.
