I Believe the answer is: Strong
An argument could be considered as storng if the data at hand show strong correlation between the argument and the fact on field.
In this case, the <span> strong correlation between execution of criminals and the decrease in number of serious criminal behavior would support the argument that favor death penalty.</span>
Answer:
The comment given by Mr. Thomas Hoving is an indicative of an art world prejudice that set less importance on functional objects. And he is giving more relevancy to the paint than the ancient greek terra cotta vase, and is more than obvious that both aspects of the object are important.
Answer:
Explanation:
He compares the role of a supreme court justice to that of an umpire in baseball or a referee in football or hockey.
He says for example, that those neutrals would never favor a team for person reasons. A team would never get unfair treatment if they were in a do or die match and had not been in such a match for 50 or more years while their opponents had one this match multiple times. Such behavior would be unthinkable.
He stated that one must uphold the rules as given to him. The idea of a referee or umpire falls apart a little here, but a supreme court justice is not obligated to uphold rules which are unconstitutional. His job is to fairly judge what should be decided. It does not matter what his own thoughts on abortion might be: he must rule on what the constitution would say about such matters.
Sometimes it is not always easy.
Answer:
culturally biased
Explanation:
culturally biased refers to an assumption that a certain phenomenon from our culture can be equally observed on the same level by other culture.
Let's take a look at this question:
<em>National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) basketball championship start?"</em>
There are two problems with this question:
- To answer this, you need to be familiar with basketball culture.
- Even if you are familiar with basketball culture, someone from outside united states is most likely wouldn't be familiar with the term that is used by Americans.
Because of these reasons, using that question to measure intelligence indicates that Dr. Ambrosia might be having a cultural bias since dr Ambrose assume that everyone from other culture would just understand the term from Dr. ambrose's culture.
