FBLA-PBL state chapters usually have a number of elected, treasurers to represent the state's various regions. Thus, option C is correct.
<h3>What is FBLA-PBL? </h3>
The goal of FBLA is to give high school students in business and/or company subjects more opportunities to build professional and career-supporting competencies and to encourage social and individual accountability as a vital component of the academic curriculum.
In a meeting of the National Leadership Conference, a state chapter shall submit a nomination for treasurer. At its multiple local gatherings at the National Leadership Conference, a state chapter shall propose the national vice presidents who will address the regions. Therefore, option C is the correct option.
Learn more about FBLA-PBL, here:
brainly.com/question/17819804
#SPJ1
Answer: Rylan's stock would sell for $21.96 at the end of the four years
Explanation:
PV = Current Price = $31.27
D = Dividend paid each year =$5.70
r = Equity cost of capital = 12%
FV = Price of Rylan's stock at the end of four years = ??
N = Number of years = 4
PV = D ![[\frac{1 - \frac{1}{(1+r)^{N} } }{r} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%281%2Br%29%5E%7BN%7D%20%7D%20%7D%7Br%7D%20%5D)
+ 
31.27 = 5.70 ![[\frac{1 - \frac{1}{(1+0.12)^{4} } }{0.12} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%281%2B0.12%29%5E%7B4%7D%20%7D%20%7D%7B0.12%7D%20%5D)
+ 
Solve for FV,
FV = $21.96
Rylan's stock would sell for $21.96 at the end of the four years
MC curve would shift downward
I hope that helped
Answer:
d. disparate treatment
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that this scenario best illustrates disparate treatment. This refers to discriminating a potential employee based on any protected characteristic (age, disability, gender reassignment, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation, marriage) even though they are just as suited or qualified as any other candidate or employee.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: Yes, because it is a contract whose terms prevent possible performance within one year
Explanation:
The Statute of Fraud mandates that certain contracts need to be written down. These contracts include the sale of land, amounts involving more than $500 and contracts that have a timeframe of over a year.
Melinda entered into a contract with terms that have to be fulfilled in more than a year. It is therefore under the Statute of Frauds.
