It's an increasing nonlinear. Exponential functions are graphed in basically any shape besides a line. This is an exponential function, therefore it is classified as nonlinear. By looking at the slope, from left to right, we can see that it is increasing, thus providing an answer that this is an increasing nonlinear function.
Answer:
14
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Answer: 4.8 ounces
Step-by-step explanation:
In total there are 12 ounces. If she drinks 3/5 of 12 you multiply 3/5 by 12.
3/5 * 12 would be equal to 3/5 * 12/1 which is 36/5. You have found how much she has drank. 36/5 is also equal to 7.2 ounces. Subtract 7.2 form 12 and you get 4.8 ounces.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
Yes
General Formulas and Concepts:
<u>Pre-Algebra</u>
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
- Brackets
- Parenthesis
- Exponents
- Multiplication
- Division
- Addition
- Subtraction
Coordinates (x, y)
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
<em>Identify</em>
Point (7, 0)
Equation y = x - 7
<u>Step 2: Find</u>
- Substitute in point [Equation]: 0 = 7 - 7
- Subtract: 0 = 0
Since 0 = 0 is true, then it would be a solution to the equation.
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coefficient between the variables h(height in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) is 0.202
Sample size n=40
Level of significane alpha = 0.01
Create null and alternate hypothesis as:
H0: r=0
Ha: r not equal 0
(Two tailed test at 1% significance level)
Sample r = 0.202
r difference = 0.202
test statistic t = 
df =n-2 =38
t critical value for 0.01 and df =38 is 2.704
Since our test statistic lies below 2.704, we accept null hypothesis
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
