The Mongol Empire (Mongolian: Mongolyn Ezent Güren listen (help·info); Mongolian Cyrillic: Монголын эзэнт гүрэн; Mongolian pronunciation: [mɔŋɡ(ɔ)ɮˈiːŋ ɛt͡sˈɛnt ˈɡurəŋ]; also Орда ("the Horde") in Russian chronicles) existed during the 13th and 14th centuries and was the largest contiguous land empire in history.[2] Originating in the steppes of Central Asia, the Mongol Empire eventually stretched from Eastern Europe and parts of Central Europe to the Sea of Japan, extending northwards into Siberia, eastwards and southwards into the Indian subcontinent, Indochina and the Iranian Plateau; and westwards as far as the Levant and the Carpathian Mountains.
Mongol Empire

Ikh Mongol Uls
1206–1368
Expansion of the Mongol Empire 1206–1294
superimposed on a modern political map of Eurasia
StatusNomadic empireCapital
1206–1235: Avarga
1235–1260: Karakorum[a]
1260–1368: Khanbaliq(Dadu)[b]
Common languages
Mongolian
Turkic
Chinese
Persian and other languages
ReligionInitially
Tengrism
Shamanism
Later
Islam
Buddhism
Nestorianism
GovernmentElective monarchy
Later also hereditaryGreat Khan
• 1206–1227
Genghis Khan
• 1229–1241
Ögedei Khan
• 1246–1248
Güyük Khan
• 1251–1259
Möngke Khan
• 1260–1294
Kublai Khan (nominal)
• 1333–1368
Toghan Temür Khan(nominal)LegislatureKurultaiHistory
• Genghis Khanproclaims
the Mongol Empire
1206
• Death of Genghis Khan
1227
• Pax Mongolica
1250–1350
• Empire fragments
1260–1294
• Fall of Yuan dynasty
1368
• Collapse of the
Chagatai Khanate
1687Area1206 (unification of Mongolia)[1]4,000,000 km2(1,500,000 sq mi)1227 (Genghis Khan's death)[1]13,500,000 km2(5,200,000 sq mi)1294 (Kublai's death)[1]23,500,000 km2(9,100,000 sq mi)1309 (last formal reunification)[1]24,000,000 km2(9,300,000 sq mi)CurrencyVarious[c]
Preceded bySucceeded byKhamag MongolKhwarazmian EmpireQara KhitaiJīn dynastySong dynastyWestern XiaAbbasid CaliphateNizari Ismaili stateKievan Rus'Volga BulgariaCumaniaAlaniaKingdom of DaliKimek KhanateGoryeoChagatai KhanateGolden HordeIlkhanateYuan dynastyNorthern Yuan dynastyTimurid EmpireAnatolian BeyliksMamluk SultanateKingdom of PolandGrand Duchy of LithuaniaMing dynastyJos
Answer: The Bill Is a Law
If a bill has passed in both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate and has been approved by the President, or if a presidential veto has been overridden, the bill becomes a law and is enforced by the government.
If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate. In the Senate, the bill is assigned to another committee and, if released, debated and voted on. Finally, a conference committee made of House and Senate members works out any differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill.
To become a law the bill must be approved by both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate and requires the Presidents approval. There are two different types of bills, private-bills that affect a specific individual and public-bills that affect the general public.
Sometimes, the resolution of differences between the House and Senate proposals may instead be accomplished through a conference committee. A conference committee is a temporary committee formed in relation to a specific bill; its task is to negotiate a proposal that can be agreed to by both chambers.
After both the House and Senate have approved a bill in identical form, the bill is sent to the President. If the President approves of the legislation, it is signed and becomes law. If the President takes no action for ten days while Congress is in session, the bill automatically becomes law.
The Slave Coast is a historical name formerly used for parts of coastal West Africa along the Bight of Benin. The name is derived from the fact that it was a major source of African slaves during the Atlantic slave trade from the early 16th century to the 19th century.
This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
