1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grin007 [14]
3 years ago
6

How did the supreme court rule in the scott v. sandford case

History
2 answers:
belka [17]3 years ago
7 0
In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories.
Rashid [163]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Finally, the Court declared that the rights of slaveowners were constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment because slaves were categorized as property.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why would Alaric sack the city of Rome after it paid him a ransom?​
oee [108]

Answer:

What Alaric really wanted was land on which his people could settle and an accepted place within the empire, which the authorities in Ravenna would not give him. Needing to keep his followers well rewarded, he marched on Rome and besieged it until the Roman senate paid him to go away.

Explanation:

Hope this helps also dont forget to give thanks

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best describes satire in excerpt
Shalnov [3]

Answer:

Chaucer criticizes the idea that forgiveness is available for purchase. This indicates that only the wealthy that are capable to find salvation in their ways of teaching.

Explanation:

hope this helps

3 0
3 years ago
What systems and events led the outbreak of the First World War in Europe
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

nationalism, militarism, alliances, and imperialisation

Explanation:

lead to armed conflict and two main sides

5 0
3 years ago
Why is Frisch making this argument? This is what is at stake for him.
kvv77 [185]

Answer:

Frisch believes that the Allies had the political and military means to have weighed other options to force unconditional surrender with Japan before using the atomic bomb.

5 0
3 years ago
Negotiation between union leaders and business management is called
konstantin123 [22]
Negotiation between union leaders and business management is called : Collective bargaining

in collective bargaining, the union leaders and business management usually talked about the more acceptable condition for the workers that would benefit both parties

hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Hi... I want to explain something to you about my life. Please listen Carefully
    13·1 answer
  • According to the Quartering Act, in which area were English soldiers supposed to be sent to maintain peace?
    13·2 answers
  • Why has socialism proven so popular in developing countries in africa and latin america?
    11·2 answers
  • What does Belshazzar promise to anyone who can read the writing on the palace wall?
    6·1 answer
  • In the early days of the united states, communities were idealized as civic republics where citizens
    13·1 answer
  • Panfilo de Narvaez main goal was to
    5·1 answer
  • How was the Japanese Emperor praised by his people?
    8·1 answer
  • The diagonal of a rectangle is 25 in. The width is 15in. What is the length
    12·1 answer
  • write a sentence that explains the difference between a nongovermental organization and govermental organizations?YALL PLEASE AS
    11·1 answer
  • The world of Thales is MOST associated with which of these?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!