Answer: C. A court’s power to adjudicate the rights to a given piece of property, including the power to seize and hold it.
Explanation: In rem jurisdiction ("power about or against 'the thing") is a legal term describing the power a court may exercise over property (either real or personal) or a "status" against a person over whom the court does not have in personam jurisdiction. Jurisdiction in rem assumes the property or status is the primary object of the action, rather than personal liabilities not necessarily associated with the property.
Answer: As long as they hold good behavior.
Explanation: As long as they play by the rules and do their job correctly and legally, they stay in their position
It depends on the like city or whatever but it’s true in most parts
If the police had no warrant saying they could go in or search Joe's house then the police could be in a certain amount of trouble as well seeing as Joe did not willingly let them in and they never had a warrant but Joe could be in a lot more trouble for being in the possession of drugs.
And smart homes should be more advanced to these kinds of things because they could have been fake cops, plus they had no warrant which leaves everyone in this situation at fault especially Joe for being in the possession of drugs and the possible false 911 call influenced on drugs either making him see things or think things, maybe even both.
