1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luba_88 [7]
3 years ago
11

In order for a plaintiff to win a case involving intentional infliction of emotional distress, one should

Law
1 answer:
Ivan3 years ago
8 0

Answer: prove the defendant acted in an extreme and outrageous manner.

Explanation:

A person who brings a case against another in a court of law for a criminal or civil case is called as plaintiff. The plaintiff is subjected to be examined on the grounds of correctness of claims by the defendant lawyer and the judge in the court of law.

Sometimes the defendant lawyer becomes too harsh in terms of examination in words that this may lead to emotional distress to the plaintiff. The plaintiff must try to protect himself or herself against the outrage.

You might be interested in
As an entrepreneur, you’ll face lots of tough and sometimes ethical decisions. In the situation described below, what do you thi
Kay [80]

Answer:

idk

Explanation:idk

6 0
3 years ago
Why does the woman believe that she’s found Lincoln’s sheet music?
omeli [17]

Answer:

BEcasue she foudn the music sheet at lincolns house

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Alcatuieste enunturi in care sa se afle :1) un atribut adjectival exprimat prin adjectiv provenit din verb la participiu ,2)un a
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

  • <u>Translated from Romanian language:</u>

"Make statements in which: 1) an adjectival attribute expressed by an adjective from the verb to the participle, 2) a substantive attribute expressed by its own noun, 3) a pronominal attribute expressed by reflexive pronouns, 4) a pronominal attribute expressed by a pronoun personally, 5) an adverbial attribute expressed by the adverb of mod."

7 0
3 years ago
Who has the ultimate authority to decide whether or not a federal law or action is constitutional?.
ValentinkaMS [17]

Supreme court has the ultimate authority to decide whether or not a federal law or action is constitutional.

What is the role of Supreme court ?

  • For all issues and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States, the Court is the highest tribunal in the country. The Supreme Court serves as the final arbiter of law, upholding the promise of equal justice under the law for all Americans. In doing so, it also serves as the Constitution's protector and interpreter.
  • According to Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, the Supreme Court is "distinctly American in idea and function." Few other courts in the world have the same constitutional interpretation authority, and none have used it as extensively or for as long.
  • The strong adherence of the American people to the Rule of Law and to constitutional government is a major contributor to the Supreme Court's unique position.

To know more about Supreme court visit:

brainly.com/question/2528721

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
E excerpt from a speech by the class president petitioning the principal to build a new stadium.
lions [1.4K]
♡︎ howdy!! ♡︎

your answer is ➪ overstatement!

goodluck on edge!! :)
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd<br>ddddddddddd
    5·2 answers
  • About HIPAA Privacy Rule?
    6·2 answers
  • What is the legal term for a lawyer/attorney who is working a case in which they know the suspect (ie. family member, co-worker,
    12·1 answer
  • In Florida,what is a CTSO in a relation to career academies in secondary schools
    8·1 answer
  • Pleaseee drop xbox gamertags for an inv to a party rn !!
    14·2 answers
  • Pretest: Unit 5
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following are major areas of interest in cognitive psychology?
    10·2 answers
  • Which amendments limit the power of the federal government.
    5·1 answer
  • A fragment of glass was found on the back of a suspect’s sweatshirt. At the crime scene, there was a window that was broken. Wha
    5·1 answer
  • in which of the following areas did regional interests and perspectives have the least impact on national policy?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!