1. Accord and satisfaction
That’s the only one I will answer but I hoped it helped a little
Answer:
$1,575
Explanation:
Calculation for the maximum amount that she may contribute to either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019
Based on the information given the maximum or highest amount that she may contribute to either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019 will be the amount of $1,575 reason been that a person or an individual which age is less than the age of 50 can have a maximum contribution of the amount of $6,000 for either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019 in which it can not in any way exceeds the earnings and secondly Investment income are not contributed to IRA which means that in the case of Victoria the amount of $1,575 will be contributed to either a traditional or Roth IRA while the amount of $100 which was earned as a result of her interest from her saving account will not be contributed.
Therefore the maximum amount that she may contribute to either a traditional or Roth IRA for the year 2019 will be $1,575
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) (Rule 26)
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is a requirement for the expert witness. If the expert fails to include this, then there is a high chance that the testimony can be thrown out.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
The primary duty of the legislative branch of government is to introduce, review and pass legislation. The legislative branch of the government is the only branch of the government that can pass new laws. This is done through the utilization of a committee system, which divides the members of Congress into smaller groups that are responsible for reviewing legislation and determining whether to introduce it to the floor for debate.
The Necessary and Proper clause was intended to allow Congress to decide whether, when and how to legislate for "carrying into execution" the powers of another branch, and at the same time intended to respect and reinforce the principle of separation of powers.
Explanation:
When the writers of the Constitution were initially deciding what powers and responsibilities the executive branch—headed by the president—would have, they were heavily influenced by their experience with the British government under King George III. Having seen how the king and other European monarchs tended to abuse their powers, the designers of the Constitution wanted to place strict limits on the power that the president would have. At the same time, they wanted to give the president enough power to conduct foreign policy and to run the federal government efficiently without being hampered by the squabbling of legislators from individual states. In other words, the Framers wanted to design an executive office that would provide effective and coherent leadership but that could never become a tyranny.
Read more: Executive Branch - The Executive Branch And The Constitution - President, Power, Powers, and Framers - JRank Articles https://law.jrank.org/pages/6652/Executive-Branch-Executive-Branch-Constitution.html#ixzz6rIgGN7y3
