The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
- Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
- If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.
Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.
In conclusion, option c is correct.
Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.
Answer:
Sbshshsusisiss
Explanation:seshshsusjjee
ehejsjss
There are many, though some are Sam Nunes, Robert Castell,
James Oglethorpe, John Reynolds, Henry Ellis, I believe.
The correct answer would be A :)
<span>The correct answer is
the fourth statement. The factor that increased trade under Mongol rule is construction
and protection of roads that ensured safe and easy travel. Mongols guaranteed
safe passage for traders, missionaries, and travelers (for example Marco Polo)
and the trade flourished causing the Mongols to gain incredible wealth taxing
the trade. </span>