1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga nikolaevna [1]
3 years ago
14

Stephen Hemmerling was a driver for the Happy Cab Co. Hemmerling paid certain fixed expenses and abided by a variety of rules re

lated to the use of the cab, the hours that could be worked, and the solicitation of fares, among other things. Rates were set by the state. Happy Cab did not withhold taxes from Hemmerling's pay. While driving the cab, Hemmerling was injured in an accident and filed a claim against Happy Cab in a Nebraska state court for Worker's Compensation benefits. Such benefits are not available to independent contractors. On what basis might the court hold that Hemmerling IS an employee? Explain fully.
Business
1 answer:
KIM [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer and Explanation:

The court can hold that Hemmerling is an employee of the Happy Cab Co. in several cases:

1) The standard operating procedures followed by Hemmerling that is stated by Happy Cab Co. such as abiding by variety of rules, the hours he could work and solicitation of fares.

2) Hemmerling also paid fixed expenses and the car provided by the cab company suggest that he works for the company just like any other employer employee relationship.

You might be interested in
I am willing to take AP classes if.<br><br>can someone help me out of explaining please​
PIT_PIT [208]
I am willing to take AP classes if the classes will continue to help my knowledge grow and provide new learning experiences.
5 0
3 years ago
In 2021, Ryan Management collected rent revenue for 2022 tenant occupancy. For financial reporting, the rent is recorded as defe
galben [10]

Answer:

                                Ryan Management

                                    Journal Entries

Date            Particulars                  Debit'million   Credit'million  

31-Dec-22   Income tax expense       $219.50

                           To Income tax payable                 $190

                            ($760 * 25%)

                           To Deferred tax asset                   $29.50

                             [($194 - $76)*25%]

                    (To record income tax expense and reversal of Deferred

                      tax asset)

6 0
3 years ago
Assume you are a single person with no dependents who made $35,000.00 from your primary job and an additional $5,500.00 from a p
kirill [66]

Answer:

a) we will get a refund

b) $3,043.75

Explanation:

Given:

Income from primary job = $35,000.00

Income from part time job = $5,500

Total income = $35000 + $5500 = $40,500

Now, As per IRS, tax brackets for 2017 is as :

For income, 0 - $9325 = 10% of Taxable Income

For income, $9326 - $37950 = $932.50 + 15% of the amount over $9325

and, for income $37,950 - $91,900 = $5226.25 + 25% of amount over $37950

Standard Deduction is $6350 for single tax payer

Now,

The Net Income = Total income - Standard deduction

= $40,500 - $6,350

= $34,150

Total Tax due = $932.50 + ( $34150 - $9325 ) × 15%

= $932.50 + $3723.75

= $4,656.25

Thus, Withheld tax amount ( i.e $7700 ) is above the tax calculated

Hence, we will get a refund

b) Amount of refund = Withheld tax - Tax due as per IRS

= $7,700 - $4,656.25

= $3,043.75

5 0
3 years ago
Instructions: Please make sure that you show all your work when solving the problems. Feel free to make any assumptions whenever
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

Explanation:

From the given information:

The current price = \dfrac{Dividend(D_o) \times (1+ Growth  \ rate) }{\text{Cost of capital -Growth rate}}

15 = \dfrac{0.50 \times (1+ Growth rate)}{8\%-Growth rate}

15 \times (8 -Growth \  rate) = 0.50 +(0.50 \times growth  \  rate)

1.20 - (15 \times Growth \ rate) = 0.50 + (0.50 \times growth \ rate)

0.70 = (15 \times growth  \ rate) \\ \\ Growth  \ rate = \dfrac{0.70}{15.50} \\ \\ Growth  \ rate = 0.04516 \\ \\ Growth  \ rate \simeq 4.52\% \\ \\

2. The value of the stock  

Calculate the earnings at the end of  5 years:

Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend \  payout  \ ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%} \\ \\ = \$1.42857

Earnings (E_5) year \  5  = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \  5  = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5  = \$2.51763

Terminal value year 5 = \dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}

=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+0.04516)}{8\%-0.04516}

=$75.526

Discount all potential future cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 +Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no\ of\ years} }

+ \dfrac{Terminal\ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years}} \Bigg)

\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}}  + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$75.526}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg )

\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$75.526}{1.4693} \bigg)

=$ 54.1945

As a result, the analysts value the stock at $54.20, which is below their own estimates.

3. The value of the stock  

Calculate the earnings at the end of  5 years:

Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend payout ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%}\\ \\ = \$1.42857

Earnings (E_5) year  \ 5  = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year  \ 5  = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \  5  = \$2.51763 \\ \\

Terminal value year 5 =\dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)\times dividend \ payout \ ratio}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}

=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+ 7 \%) \times 20\%}{8\%-7\%}

=$53.8773

Discount all potential cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 + Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no \ of\ years} }+ \dfrac{Terminal \ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years }}   \bigg)

\implies \bigg( \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}}  + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$53.8773}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg)

\implies \bigg (\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$53.8773}{1.4693} \bigg)

=$39.460

As a result, the price is $39.460, and the other strategy would raise the value of the shareholders. Not this one, since paying a 100% dividend would result in a price of $54.20, which is higher than the current price.

Notice that the third question depicts the situation after 5 years, but the final decision will be the same since we are discounting in current terms. If compounding is used, the future value over 5 years is just the same as the first choice, which is the better option.

The presumption in the second portion is that after 5 years, the steady growth rate would be the same as measured in the first part (1).

8 0
3 years ago
When the alternatives under consideration have only disbursements (service alternatives), the do-nothing alternative must be inc
Rom4ik [11]
Answer: False

Explanation:
When more than one alternative can be selected from those available, the alternatives are said to be mutually exclusive. In evaluating independent alternatives, each alternative is compared against the "Do Nothing" alternative.
For mutually exclusive alternatives, the do-nothing is a viable option when revenue alternatives are involved.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Factor Co. can produce a unit of product for the following costs: Direct material $ 8 Direct labor 24 Overhead 40 Total product
    11·1 answer
  • Economics is the social science that tries to explain
    7·1 answer
  • In which step of the production process are
    10·1 answer
  • Question 8
    13·2 answers
  • There are many activities in marketing that are interrelated and similar in purpose. These activities are referred to as marketi
    10·1 answer
  • Thomas &amp; Cooke Corporation has the following sales forecasts for the first three months of the current year: Month Sales Jan
    12·1 answer
  • In early 2018, selected automobiles had an average cost of $20,000. The average cost of those same motor vehicles is now $24,000
    8·1 answer
  • Weisman, Inc. uses activity-based costing as the basis for information to set prices for its six lines of seasonal coats.
    12·1 answer
  • When a firm goes bankrupt, shareholders ______. Multiple choice question. can sue for loses cannot recover their risk capital ar
    11·1 answer
  • Geraldo gauged the level of exposure to his marketing campaign using the percentage of the target population exposed at least on
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!