Answer:
Reasons for irrational behaviour : Political brand name establishment in favour of candidate, enhancing brand loyalty towards.
More knowledgable public : Would value candidate working on real development, rather than mere brand name.
Explanation:
Political elections are determined by the public's impressions of the candidates rather than the candidates' views on the issues.
Reason(s) of such irrational voting behaviour could be : The candidate having established a personal brand image of himself/ herself, specially in a particular community group. This makes the people of the community being 'brand loyal' towards their candidate, irrespective of his or her ideologies. It is also possible to make that political personality (candidate) an important part of 'national image' or 'community leader image', which reinforce support for the candidate, irrespective of person perception and attitudes.
If public were more knowledgeable about factors that affect person perception and attitudes : The political support would not be based on lineaged political brand names. It would rather be earned on the basis of candidate's performance for socio - economic, political upliftment. This would give power in the hands of deserving politicians & create a message that 'real work' & not just 'name' is needed to gain political success
Answer:
The major purpose of the earliest concentration camps during the 1930s was to incarcerate and intimidate the leaders of political, social, and cultural movements. that the Nazis perceived to be a threat to the survival of the regime. The first Nazi concentration camp was Dachau, established in March 1933, near Munich.
Explanation:
that the Nazis perceived to be a threat to the survival of the regime. The first Nazi concentration camp was Dachau, established in March 1933, near Munich.
He was a United States Senator from Hawaii from 1963 to 2012. He was a member of the Democratic Party, and he was President pro tempore of the United States Senate (third in line in the Presidential Line of Succession) from 2010 until his death in 2012, making him the highest-ranking Asian American politician in U.S. history. Inouye also served as chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations.
Answer:
a letter written by a person who is describing a current event
Explanation:
A primary source is a document from the time period of the event.
While most of these could be considered one, you have to do a process of elimination.
A scholarly article about an old event isn't a primary source, so it's not that.
An interview with a reporter who wrote about a current event is not a primary source because it is not the original document from the reporter.
A student's report about an event that occurred during her lifetime is a primary source, but it is not the best example.
I believe the answer is: <span>be difficult to assure that the use of information gathered would do no harm
Anthropology studies the cultures and habbits that exist in a certain society and make a conclusion based on their observation.
There are a lot of cases when the conclusion of their observation is wrong and could ignite conflicts between different social groups. To prevent such things from happening, the rule above was created.</span>
