Answer:
to deliver electric shocks to a learner for giving incorrect answers
Explanation:
The Milgram obedience studies also known as the Milgram Shock Experiment was conducted at the Yale University which focused on the investigation of obedience to authority and personal conscience and that to what extent the participants are ready to go to be considered obedient. Stanley Milgram divided participants into teachers and learners and order the participants to deliver electric shocks to a learner for giving incorrect answers. This was a highly controversial research however, it highlighted the personal want for acceptance and reward in human beings.
The answer is D. Iroquois
Jesus was a man who, according to the various books of the Bible, was the son of God. They speak of their passage through the world as an act of God´s redemption for the world, since sin had generated a state of crisis that could even destroy the social foundations, and this problem could not be solved even by the rulers of the epoch.
Even personally I do not believe in Jesus, the simple fact Christianity is a religion which allows the people to do the correct and help the others is so respectable.
T made political and economic sense for some to do so.
Explanation:
First off, not all Native Americans supported the French during the colonial wars. Most Algonquian speakers supported the French and most Iroquois supported the English. In general, the key concepts here are economic power and political power.
The fur trade dominated colonial relations from the Ohio Valley and the Upper Midwest. Whoever controlled the economy of that area would have both economic and political power. The Iroquois were positioned to control trade via the Great Lakes. Algonquian speakers were able to go around them and deal directly with Europeans. Iroquois leaders attempted to push into the interior using British guns while Algonquians pushed the Lakota out of Minnesota and onto the plains.
Many Algonquians intermarried with the French and created a new ethnic group, the Metis who also aligned with the French, in part, because both were Catholic.
The way that Romans 8. 13 happens to contradict the teachings of Paul on Salvation and justification is that it talks about the fact that people would have do die based on the way that live after he has taught the people earlier on eternal salvation.
<h3>Who was Paul?</h3>
He was one of the people that spread the gospel after Jesus Christ had ascended into heaven.
According to the passage in Romans 8. 13, he is trying to encourage the people to live a more Godly life. This is seen in his choice of wealth. According to him, when a person goes ahead to live a displeasing life, they would die, but when a person lives a more Christian life then they would have eternal life.
Read more on Paul here: brainly.com/question/16331056
#SPJ1
