Answer:
A) whether collaboration pays for itself.
Explanation:
Collaboration refers to a situation where two separate companies decide to leverage each other on an operational basis, in order for them to perform better together than they did separately.
The whole idea behind collaboration is to make more money by working together, therefore the collaboration should not only pay for itself but should also increase both companies' profits by boosting sales, engage in larger contracts, cut costs, etc.
If they are not going to win anything by working together, why should they do it?
Answer:
that's nice, my teachers do that too on breaks
Explanation:
<span>The Menendez family has a net income of $4,500. The chart shows their cost-of-living percentages. How much do they spend on transportation?</span>
In this scenario, Blue Tech Inc.'s failure can be best attributed to <u>"Time compression diseconomies."</u>
We accept time compression diseconomies where the snappier a firm builds up the asset, the higher the improvement cost. We demonstrate that time compression diseconomies normally offer ascent to asset heterogeneity and henceforth upper hand in that one firm builds up the asset quicker than the other. We evaluate the supportability of the upper hand, determine conditions
under which the asset is "incomparable" and demonstrate that firm benefits are nonmonotonic in the degree of time compression diseconomies.
