Answer:
The correct answer is: 15 points on the History exam.
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is what a person sacrifices when they choose one option over another. It is calculating by subtracting the return of the best forgone option with the return of the chosen option. The outcome could be beneficial or prejudicial, depending on the case.
In the example (<u>refer to the attached table</u>), if the student chooses to score 94 in the economics exam then the student will get 76 in the History test. Thus, The opportunity cost of getting 94 instead of 77 in the Economics test, implies getting 76 instead of 91 in the History exam. It implies:
- Opportunity cost of the History exam = 91-76
- Opportunity cost of the History exam = 15
<em>The opportunity cost of scoring 94 on the Economics exam rather than a 77 is 15 points on the History test.</em>
Answer:
d. 4%.
Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
We know that
Expected stock return = Risk free rate + Beta × Market risk premium
So,
Expected stock return X is
= 2% + 1.4 × 5%
= 9%
And,
Expected stock return Y is
= 2% +.8 × 5%
= 6%
Now
Expected Portfolio return Y and risk free asset is
= Weight stock y × return Y + Weight risk-free asset × Return risk-free asset
= .5 × 6% + .5 × 2%
= 4%
Answer:
It is capital deepening (D)
Explanation:
Capital deepening typically represents an increase in the capital-labor ratio. This arises when there is infusion of additional capital(e.g technological improvement) into the production processes while work force is either kept constant or cut-down and thereby makes labor to be more productive.
Hence, as the capital-labor ratio increases, the marginal product of labor, i.e. the amount of product that can be produced by supplying one more unit of labor, increases because there are now more units of capital per worker.
Answer:
B. Sharing a personal experience
Explanation:
<span>Brittani is in an ethical dilemma because she does not want to disrespect the president written article but she must provide him with accurate feedback for the company. Brittani must approach the situation with respect and facts. The best way for Brittani to do this is to call the president and ask for a face to face meeting and to gently point out not only the flaws in the article but also the strong points.</span>
