Options :
a. mistake.
b. opinion.
c. an adhesion contract.
d. fraud.
Answer: Fraud
Explanation: From the scenario described above, it could be inferred that Ken, the real estate agent used trickery to lure Lily into purchasing the property. Hence, Lily could be said to have been defrauded by Ken who used what Lily needed to trick her into making the purchase because the main specification, that is high traffic, which Ken used to lure Lily was actually false. Fraud remains a grave offence as it could only be carried out by lying, issuing false statement, blackmail, impersonation and other grave offences.
A voidable contract, unlike a void contract, is a valid contract which may be either affirmed or rejected at the option of one of the parties.
Reasons that can make a contract voidable include failure by one or both parties to disclose a material fact; a mistake, misrepresentation or fraud; undue influence or duress; one party's legal incapacity to enter a contract; one or more terms that are unconscionable; or a breach of contract.
Answer:
<em>a. discriminative stimuli.
</em>
Explanation:
Discriminative stimulus is a concept used as a step in the process recognized as operant conditioning in classical conditioning.
A discriminative stimulus is a form of stimulation which is regularly used to elicit a particular response and increases the likelihood of the intended response.