All categories

3 years ago

According to Anti-Federalists, the Constitution

History

2 answers:

Olin [163]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Make the president too powerful

Explanation:

Just took the test

EastWind [94]3 years ago

3 0

The correct answer is C) could give the president too much power.

<em>According to Anti-federalists, the Constitution could give the president too much power.</em>

The Anti-federalist did not support the idea of giving too much power to the President of the United States. Indeed, Thomas Jefferson, one of the leaders of the Anti-federalists, had many concerns about the powers that the Constitution was granted to the presidency. They considered that too much power in one hand would derive in authoritarianism or dictatorship, as was the case of the English monarchy. That is why they wrote the Bill of Rights, to favor the US citizens against total control of the government.

You might be interested in

True or False: The early Grand Princes of Kiev became Roman Catholics

luda_lava [24]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The Early Grand Princes of Kev did not become Roman Catholics. One of the Early Grand Princes of Kev known as Vladimir Sviatoslavich ( Vladimir the great ) was the first Prince to be become a Christian.

He was an Orthodox Christian i.e and Orthodox Catholic and not a Roman Catholic. He practised Byzantine Christianity.

As an Orthodox Christian or Catholic, they spoke Greek and the Priests were allowed to get married.

6 0

3 years ago

How do liberals and conservatives view government

slega [8]

Conservatives want smaller government and less government spending(In general). Liberals like a bigger government and more government spending to put it simply

3 0

3 years ago

Explain in detail about the policies that were adopted from the nonMuslims by Aurangzeb

telo118 [61]

Answer:

Lane-Poole, “For the first time in their history, the Mughals beheld a rigid Muslim in their emperor—a Muslim as sternly repressible of himself as of his people around him, a king who was prepared to stake his throne for sake of his faith.
He must have been fully conscious of the dangerous path he was pursuing, and well aware against every Hindu sentiment. Yet he chose this course, and adhered to this with unbending resolve through close on fifty years of unchallenged sovereignty.”
Dr. S.R. Sharma, writing about the acts of religious intolerance of Aurangzeb has observed, “These were not the acts of a righteous ruler of constructive statesman, but the outbursts of blind fanaticism, unworthy of the great genius that Aurangzeb undoubtedly possessed in all other aspects.”

Aims of Aurangzeb’s religious policy:

It is generally accepted that Aurangzeb was a fanatic Sunni Mussalman. His chief aim was to convert Dar-ul-harb (India: the country of Kafirs or infidels) to Dar-ul-Islam (country of Islam).
He was intolerant towards other faiths, especially Hindus. He was also against Shia Muslims.

Aurangzeb’s religious policy had two aspects i.e:

(i) To promote the tenets of Islam and to ensure that the people led their lives accordingly.

(ii) To adopt anti-Hindu measures. Anti-Hindu measures:

Following were the anti-Hindu measures adopted by Aurangzeb:

Demolishing temples and breaking idols
Imposition of Jaziya
Discriminatory toll far
Removal of the Hindus from Government jobs
Restrictions on Hindu educational institutions
Conversion through different means
Social restrictions

8 0

3 years ago

What’s the answer????!!

Mademuasel [1]

Answer:

i think it is b but i am not sure

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

What did franklin roosevelt ask of britain in return for sending supplies to them in the lend-lease program?

astra-53 [7]

c. the promise the Britain would protect US ships traveling across the Atlantic

8 0

3 years ago