1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natali 33 [55]
3 years ago
6

The person granting another person to act on their behalf using a power of attorney is called a _______________.

Law
1 answer:
Mashcka [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: Principal

Explanation: A principal is a person who legally gives a power of attorney to another person to acts on his behalf.

The person called the agent can act legally on behalf of the principal in all capacity covered in the power of attorney.

A power of attorney (POA) is a legal document that allows a principal to appoint a person or organization (known as an agent ) to act on his behalf.

You might be interested in
Republicans tend to favor a small government that does not intervene too often in the economy, believing which of the following
tatyana61 [14]
My answer would be A
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A person who serves “at the pleasure of the president”
raketka [301]

Answer:

legal bem louco não entendi nada

4 0
3 years ago
Keeping in mind the constitutional war powers of Congress and the President, how would you assess the
Goryan [66]

Answer:

"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What meant by the rule of law​
jonny [76]

the principle that all people and institutions are subject to and accountable to law that is fairly applied and enforced; the principle of government by law.

7 0
3 years ago
Give an example of one or two Supreme Court cases (including dates and titles of the court cases) and whether you believe the de
Arte-miy333 [17]

Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is not a precaution to take when hauling a trailer?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the main way political parties are able to shape public policy?
    15·1 answer
  • 8) In general,
    6·1 answer
  • Which amendment places a 2 term limit on the President of the United<br> States *
    15·1 answer
  • Chris is the owner of a fast food stall. Dan bought some food from Chris' stall. Dan became
    12·1 answer
  • A surgeon made a mistake during a complicated operation that led to
    7·2 answers
  • The highway transportation system is made up of
    7·1 answer
  • NEED THIS ASAP PLEASE HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIST WILL GIVE 10 PTS
    6·1 answer
  • A. Explain right-of-way rules for navigating a roundabout.
    8·2 answers
  • What is a designated driver?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!