1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aniked [119]
3 years ago
12

What are the intended and unintended consequences of increased lengths of incarceration?

Law
1 answer:
adelina 88 [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

I believe intended actions are to prevent further criminal action from occurring, disciplining inmates and offering salvation to those who committed crimes by mandatorily serving time. Unintended consequences like the environment of having to be around so many inmates is increased hostility, mental instability and isolation contributing to inmates psychological deterioration. Simply put, intended; be a good boy, don't mess up and maybe one day you'll get out. // Not intended; being a bad boy because you've been given a life sentence and see no reason not to throw your life away because you're not getting out anyways.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In 2009, which case qualified the earlier New York v. Belton court decision on conducting searches in the passenger compartments
insens350 [35]

Answer:

Arizona v. Gant

Explanation:

Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a USA Supreme Court choice stating that the 4th Amendment to the USA Constitution requires law implementation officials to exhibit a real and proceeding with danger to their wellbeing presented by an arrestee, or a need to protect proof identified with the wrongdoing of capture from altering by the arrestee, so as to legitimize a warrantless vehicular pursuit episode to capture directed after the vehicle's ongoing tenants have been captured and made sure about.

3 0
3 years ago
Jessica Grayson is a secretary at Washington High School. She is in charge of ordering janitorial supplies from Joe's Cleaning C
r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer: Jessica = Embezzlement

Jake = Forgery

Both = Conspiracy

Explanation:

• Jessica,s crime is embezzlement.

Embezzlement is when an individual misappropriates the fund that has been entrusted and placed in the person's care. In this case, Jessica steals the company's fund that is in her possession and this is a financial fraud.

• Jake's crime is forgery

Forgery is when a take signature, false document, or something else is being copied so as to deceive someone else. This is punishable as the person will be charged with fraud.

• The crime of both of them is conspiracy.

A conspiracy is simply when there is an agreement that takes place between two or more people when they want to commit a crime. In this scenario, both Jake and Jessica agreed to carry out the fraud.

6 0
4 years ago
Question 40(Multiple Choice Worth 2 points)
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

Judicial independence is important because it guarantees that judges are free to decide honestly and impartially, in accordance with the law and evidence, without concern or fear of interference, control, or improper influence from anyone.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading?
fgiga [73]

The statement that is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading is: The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit.

What is protocol?

Protocol can be defined as a set of guideline or policy that is expected of a person or an individual to follow or abide by.

Since parents or students have the right to ask that a school correct education records in which they tend to believe to be inaccurate or misleading.  The school district can choose to disregard claims without merit is NOT protocol if a parent feels an education record is inaccurate or misleading.

Learn more about protocol here:brainly.com/question/5660386

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
The conversation below took place between two U.S. citizens.
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

2.freedom of speech

Explanation:

Kevin and Peggy are saying what they think about Police

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP
    14·1 answer
  • Does the child in the crosswalk have the right of way? Explain why or why not? I will give brainliest for best answer
    13·1 answer
  • When a law has been violated, what must be given?
    8·1 answer
  • Can the police get you out of your car, without a permission or an excuse?
    11·1 answer
  • Though the two political parties often differ on their beliefs, sometimes they are able to come together in support known as____
    11·1 answer
  • If driving under the influence leads to a fatal collision, the driver could be charged
    10·2 answers
  • A fellow employee, who is a disabled veteran, is complaining to you that she feels she was discriminated against in not getting
    10·1 answer
  • A student pushes a box with a force of 20 N to the right and another student pushes the box with a force of 5 N to the left.
    9·2 answers
  • Why are private businesses simpler to operate than public companies?
    15·1 answer
  • When he was hired, Javon was told he would get a 4%
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!