Answer:
McCulloch v. Maryland was a decision of the United States Supreme Court. The state of Maryland attempted to prevent a branch of the Second Bank of the United States from operating by imposing a tax on all banknotes of banks not founded in Maryland. The Second Bank of the United States was the only bank then present in the state that had not been founded on it. The Court invoked the Theory of Implicit Powers of the Constitution, which allowed the Federal Government to pass laws that are not expressly provided for in the Constitution, from a list of expressed powers, provided that those laws are useful for Congress's powers, pursuant to Constitution.
Answer:
Sí, las pruebas exhibidas con la demanda y las que obran en el expediente principal pueden ser utilizadas en un incidente judicial. Así, por ejemplo, en un expediente principal donde el objeto del mismo es un reclamo de daños y perjuicios, puede iniciarse un incidente (es decir, un expediente subordinado al expediente principal) solicitando se otorgue el beneficio de litigar sin gastos, debido a la falta de capacidad económica por parte del actor. Así, el actor podrá, utilizando medidas de prueba aportadas al expediente principal (como testigos que acrediten su situación económica personal, etc.) citar el expediente principal como prueba en el incidente iniciado.
This statement is false.
Since the middle of the 1960s, the expansion of social welfare programs has been a major concern for American domestic politics.
Conservatives criticized the continuous growth of these programs, saying it had put an unacceptably high cost on the American taxpayers while doing little to help the poor's long-term concerns.
Reagan quickly slowed the rate of growth in domestic spending after being elected president in 1980 in part due to dissatisfaction with social programs.
Reagan has maintained that his budget-cutting initiatives are primarily intended to benefit low-income people who have been able to generate significant incomes by fusing their work-related gains with federal funding and "inkind" benefits.
The "really needy"—those with the lowest incomes—would be exempt from budget cuts. In February 1981, Reagan remarked, "Those who, through no fault of their own, must depend on the rest of us, the poor, the handicapped, the aged, all those with actual need, can rest confident that the social safety net of programs they depend on are exempt from any reduction."
To know more about Reagan, visit:
brainly.com/question/4784629
#SPJ4
Is there a picture you could post or add on here