All categories

3 years ago

Please help me with the question below

Mathematics

2 answers:

I am Lyosha [343]3 years ago

8 0

a) Angle XBC = 55 because XY is parallel with BD

b) As given, XB = XC, so that triangle XBC is the equilateral triangle.

As XBC is equilateral triangle, angle XBC is equal to angle XCB

Angle XBC = 55° => Angle XCB = 55°

In a triangle, the total value of three corners are equal to 180°

So that: Angle XBC + Angle XCB + Angle BXC = 180°

=> 55° + 55° + Angle BXC = 180 °

=> Angle BXC = 70°

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/15317951#readmore

jonny [76]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

a) Angle XBC = 55 because XY is parallel with BD

b) As given, XB = XC, so that triangle XBC is the equilateral triangle.

As XBC is equilateral triangle, angle XBC is equal to angle XCB

Angle XBC = 55° => Angle XCB = 55°

In a triangle, the total value of three corners are equal to 180°

So that: Angle XBC + Angle XCB + Angle BXC = 180°

=> 55° + 55° + Angle BXC = 180 °

=> Angle BXC = 70°

You might be interested in

Help please!!!,,,,,,

sdas [7]

Answer: 2x+5y=100 and x+y=38

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

(2 points) Consider the linear system y⃗ ′=[−35−23]y⃗ . Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors for the coefficient matrix. ????1=

oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

Please see the attached file for the complete answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Download pdf

6 0

3 years ago

For every 1/4 mi Pascal walks Lucien runs 2/3 mi. How many miles does Pascal walk for every 1 mi Lucien runs? Write your answers

attashe74 [19]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: The answer is 0.5

7 0

3 years ago

D=DVDs and G=Games solve for 2D+3G=15.50 and 3D+1G=12.05

kogti [31]

We have

1G = 12.05 - 3D;

Then,

2D + 3( 12.05 - 3D) = 15.50;

2D + 36.15 - 9D = 15.50;

- 7D = - 20.65;

D = 2.95;

Finally, G = 12.05 - 3 x 2.95;

G = 3.20;

3 0

3 years ago

Student performance across discussion sections: A professor who teaches a large introductory statistics class (197 students) wit

adell [148]

Answer:

The test is not significant at 5% level of significance, hence we conclude that there's no variation among the discussion sections.

Step-by-step explanation:

Assumptions:

1. The sampling from the different discussion sections was independent and random.

2. The populations are normal with means and constant variance

$H_0:$ There's no variation among the discussion sections

$H_1:$ There's variation among the discussion sections

$\alpha =0.05$

Df Sum Sq Mean sq F value Pr(>F)

Section 7 525.01 75 1.87 0.99986

Residuals 189 7584.11 40.13

Test Statistic = $F= \frac{75}{40.13} =1.87$

$Pr(>F) = 0.99986$

Since our p-value is greater than our level of significance (0.05), we do not reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there's no significant variation among the eight discussion sections.

3 0

3 years ago