Answer: It was bordered by enemies on two fronts. Attack France in the West before Russia in the East had a chance to mobilize. Heavy casualties and little territorial gain.
Explanation:
The "great silent majority" that nixon appealed to southern white Democrats and working- and middle-class white.
<h3>
Silent majority</h3>
The silent majority conveys a powerful voting demographic. Politicians who are able to demand to the silent majority can turn elections in their turn and have an easier time endorsing their policies.
The silent majority is an unknown large group of people in a country or group who do not define their opinions publicly.The term was popular by U.S. President Richard Nixon. In this he referred to those Americans who did not bind in the large demonstrations against the Vietnam War at the time, who did not enter in the counterculture, and who did not partake in public discourse.
To learn more about silent majority visit the link
brainly.com/question/8534842
#SPJ4
Different races can now go to the same schools
1.For the first time, a shared faith in Islam allowed the newly organized state to mobilize the military potential of the entire Arab population.
2.The Byzantine and Persian empires were weakened by decades of war with each other and by internal revolts.
3.Merchant leaders of the new Islamic community wanted to capture the profitable trade routes of the Silk Roads.
4.Individual Arabs found in military expansion a route to wealth and social promotion.
5.Expansion provided a common task for the Arab community, which reinforced the fragile unity of the umma.
6.Arabs were motivated by a religious dimension, as many viewed the mission of empire in terms of jihad, bringing righteous government to the peoples they conquered.
Answer:
Why shouldn't we judge historical figures by the standards of our time?
Many of the vices we might rightfully judge a historical society or individual for are largely universal across culture and society.
We should judge them accordingly and learn from their mistakes, but we should also judge them by the degree to which that person or culture rejected those common vices and built something better. This is something quite rare and it’s far more useful as a learning tool for us to focus on this.
For example, the Greeks and Romans practiced slaveryBut so did every other ancient society. What is unique and admirable about the Greeks and Romans is the degree to which they did respect indvidual rights, seriously questioned slavery as an institution, and developed a secular, pro reason culture
if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest
