The answer is A. Kotowski cites four scholars who specialize in the study of volcanoes, whereas Ferguson cites only the encyclopedia.
The given thesis is arguing that Kotowski is more reliable than Ferguson because he backs up his statements with a greater number of more reliable sources. In choice A, Kotowski is not only using three more sources than Ferguson, but they're sources from reputable specialists, making them higher quality sources as well.
If you're still confused, you can use elimination to rule out the others:
B. B doesn't work because there's no mention of the rate of volcanic change in the thesis. Although the statement may be true, it's not evidence to support the writer's claim.
C. C doesn't work because there's no mention of the frequency of volcanic eruption in the thesis. Again, although the statement may be true, it doesn't necessarily support the writer's claim.
D. D doesn't work because there's no mention of the similarities between the two pieces. If the thesis is arguing that Kotowski's work is different from Ferguson's because it's more reliable, it'd be counterproductive for the writer to mention the similarities of the work. Therefore, this "evidence" has no relation to the thesis and would not support the author's thesis.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
A, Join in the Fun Run to help a good cause, make friends, and get healthy.
Explanation:
<em>B causes people to have the "if only 75% need to join, why does that mean me?" mindset.</em>
<em />
<em>C causes people to have the "why does that matter it's not me?" mindset.</em>
<em />
<em>D is not a compelling argument to make to a student.</em>
Answer:
The detail is given below:
Explanation:
This question is from the story ''Orpheus and Eurydice''. The third paragraph represents the whole idea of the story. It is about the analysis of the personality of a person, who got motivated by their own goods and bads. It says that if one can find true love, then the suffering is worth it.
We can even sacrifice ourselves for true love and that won't be a waste. This story shows the importance of trust and how it can change once life.
1. Would you like to join my band? - add 'you like to'
2. Martina's band has played in concerts since 2013. - add 'since'
3. Her old band was not as good as her new one. - add 'as good'
4. There are six people in Martina's band. - add 'are six people'
5. You don't have to pay anything to get into their concerts. - add 'have to'
