1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
asambeis [7]
2 years ago
7

The hypothesis H0: \mu=350H 0 : μ = 350 versus H_a:\mu<350H a : μ < 350 are examined using a sample of size n = 20. The on

e-sample t statistic has the value t=-1.68t = − 1.68. What do we know about the P-value of this test
Mathematics
1 answer:
Zolol [24]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The statistic for this case is given t =-1.68

The degrees of freedom are given by:

df =n-1= 20-1=19

Since is a one-side lower test the p value would given by:  

p_v =P(t_{19}  

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation  

\bar X represent the sample mean  

s represent the sample standard deviation  

n=20 sample size  

\mu_o =350 represent the value that we want to test  

\alpha represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.  

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

p_v represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)  

State the null and alternative hypotheses.  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the mean is lower than 350, the system of hypothesis are :  

Null hypothesis:\mu \geq 350  

Alternative hypothesis:\mu < 350  

Since we don't know the population deviation, is better apply a t test to compare the actual mean to the reference value, and the statistic is given by:  

t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}} (1)  

t-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine if the mean is (higher, less or not equal) to an specified value".  

Calculate the statistic  

The statistic for this case is given t =-1.68

P-value  

The degrees of freedom are given by:

df =n-1= 20-1=19

Since is a one-side lower test the p value would given by:  

p_v =P(t_{19}  

You might be interested in
FIRST TERM IS 3 and COMMOND DIFFERENCE IS 5
pochemuha

Answer:

WHY IS THIS IN CAPS

Step-by-step explanation:

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGHHHHH

4 0
3 years ago
The value of the expression 2(3) +3(2)–3x4–5(2)-5+(7x4) is
Sliva [168]

Answer: the answer is 46

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
2 years ago
I drove 380 miles using 14 gallons of gas. At this rate, how many gallons of gas would I need to drive 418 miles?
ser-zykov [4K]

Answer:

15.4 gallons .

Step-by-step explanation:

The rate of gas used  = 380/14 = 27.14 gallons per gallon.

So for each gallon used  you drive 27.14 miles.

So number of gallons used when travelling 418 miles = 418/27.14

= 15.4 gallons .


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%20%3D%20%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%20%2B%20%20%5Cfrac%7Bw%7D%7B3%7D%20" id="TexFormula1" ti
ElenaW [278]

Answer:  \bold{w=\dfrac{6y-3}{2}}

<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>

Isolate w by performing the following steps

  • Multiply by 6 on both sides to clear the denominator
  • Subtract 3 from both sides
  • Divide both sides by 2

y=\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{w}{3}\\\\\\6\bigg[y=\dfrac{1}{2}+\dfrac{w}{3}\bigg]\quad \implies \quad 6y=3+2w\\\\\\6y-3=3-3+2w\quad \implies \quad 6y-3=2w\\\\\\\dfrac{6y-3}{2}=\dfrac{2w}{2}\quad \implies \quad \large\boxed{\dfrac{6y-3}{2}=w}

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jan bought a blazer for 39.90. The price of the blazer was $38. What sales tax rate was she charged for this blazer?
    13·2 answers
  • Write a real world situation that could be misled by the question.Then Solve for the unknown in the situation.
    5·1 answer
  • Solve The Math equation below
    10·1 answer
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST :))
    9·1 answer
  • Two cars leave the park at the same time opposite directions one goes 3 times faster after 6 hours they travel 140miles how fast
    15·1 answer
  • Simplify the following expression. 3 + [(7 ÷ 7)] × 6
    6·2 answers
  • A chemist mixes 25 milliliters of a solution that is 44% acid with 225 milliliters of pure acid.
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASEE I NEED YOUR HELP.
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone help me pls!!!!
    8·2 answers
  • Please don’t copy and paste the answer from another Brainly, if I asked this question again is because the answers I read weren’
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!