I would know about John Marshall. He was a federalist supreme court chief justice. He gave more power to the government by taking a loose construction of the Constitution. So basically he said, "If it doesnt say we (Fed Gov't) cant do it, then we can)".
<span>Know about these Court cases </span>
<span>Gibbons V. Ogden </span>
<span>McCullough V. Maryland </span>
<span>Fletcher V. Peck </span>
<span>Cohens V. Virginia </span>
<span>Barron V. Baltimore- this one is hard to find, so basically it just said that because the Bill of Rights was a Federal decision, it didnt apply to the states. </span>
<span>The rest are really easy to find out about, and you could type in John Marshall and it would probably give you all of these. </span>
<span>http://www.ushistory.org/valleyforge/served/marshall.html </span>
<span>http://www.lawnix.com/cases/gibbons-ogden.html- heres gibbons/ogden</span>
He was personally into classic architecture.....at home and away. i think that prolly featured in his method of governance, but i don't know anything about that personally source:
brainly.com/question/2579139
Answer:
Correct answer is B. nonprofit agencies that aid human interests and that are not attached to any government.
Explanation:
Option A is not correct, because this are unlawful groups, whose goal is to gain benefit through crime.
Option B is correct as NGOs are not attached to governments and are non-profit organizations, with an aim to help people in different areas.
Option C is also not correct as militia groups are also unlawful groups.
Option D is not correct as refuges and asylees seeker are people in need that have been protected by certain state.
Freedom of Speech
Freedom of the press
Freedom of religion
Right to petition the government
Right to assemble
