Question

Consider the following (fictitious) conclusion reached by a social psychologist: "After analyzing a sample of over 578 experiments, we have concluded that the question of whether men are more likely than women to help is difficult to answer. Based on the findings of this large number of studies, we have concluded that men are more likely to help when helping demands physical risk or 'chivalry;' otherwise, there are no reliable gender differences in helping." This conclusion about the reliability of the relation between gender and helping was most likely based on
A) pure conjecture.
B) surveys of researchers.
C) meta-analytic techniques.
D) correlational research.
E) experimental procedures.

Answer 1

Answer:

d) correlational research

Explanation:

Because of the number of people in this study, researches have enough evidence for settle a relation among helping in different situations.

Correlational studies, are used in psychology to relate two or more variables. In this case, how is the behavior or disponibility of men and women in front of different events like helping animals, people in street, people in danger, etc.