I am not writing the format of the letter or anything, but I will write a small para for u .
Dear (whoever),
We are safe here , hope everything is fine at home too . The crusades fight goes on from morning to evening . Hope everyone is healthy at home . Also convey my best of luck to my brother for his final test next month .
I am seeing a crusade war for the first time in my life . I am very scared but also feeling quite relieved that my elder brother is also there with me . He couldn’t write a letter to you as he is very busy here . In the was , a lot of bloodshed takes place and knives , swords and many other weapons are used . We will reach home back soon hopefully after the war . I wish we return victorious and we all can celebrate our victory at home .
Try giving a letter in reply soon . Waiting to hear from you , father and brother .
This is it , you can change anything if u want , any grammar mistakes then pls forgive ...
Hope this was helpful .
Answer:
B. Global winds
C. Solar radiation
Explanation:
Ocean current is can simply be define as water in motion and can be observed easily in oceans. When the global wind blows, it enforces the molecule sof water at the upper region of the ocen to move. This causes ocean current.
Solar radiation causes uneven heating (variation in temperature) of sections of the water, thus variation in density. This forces the molecules into motion.
One of the main ways in which composers changed the way they composed from the Classical era to the Romantic era was that they took more risks and "broke the rules" when it came to structure and melodic movement.
Answer:
Narratives may provide suppositions about causes and effects, describing strategies and outcomes of certain historical events while historical timelines offers a vision of an event in facts and figures, therefore interpreting historical timeline may as well be a historical narrative, while interpreting a historical narrative is a confirmed indirect ( mediated) interpretation that could provide an outcome with a consistent historical bias