1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vika [28.1K]
4 years ago
11

What is a difference between an authoritarian and a democratic government

History
1 answer:
Margaret [11]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Unlike democratic constitutions, authoritarian constitutions do not set direct limits on executive authority; however, in some cases such documents may function as ways for elites to protect their own property rights or constrain autocrats' behavior.

You might be interested in
Under the rule of Huayna capac, the Inca empire__
Grace [21]

The answer is D. All of Huayna people favored him. He was very successful in the upbringing of the Inca Empire. He expanded his empire significantly to the south side making is double in size, making him more powerful. Please give me the brainliest answer.

7 0
3 years ago
What type of internal improvements did American system create?​
Ivanshal [37]
Oh man I was going to answer that I got so excited because I learned about that but this person is absolutely right
7 0
4 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!!!!!! CORRECT ANSWERS ONLY PLEASEEEE HELP A GIRL OUT
eduard

Answer:

D

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what where the major developments in the transportion during the early 800s ASAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP PLEASE NOW
algol [13]

Answer:

wheels of rocks ,carts ,

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was the effect of rotten boroughs on the democratic process in england?
vesna_86 [32]
You didn't give us answer choices, but we can at least define "rotten boroughs" for you here ... and that may be enough to lead you to the correct answer.

A "rotten borough," also sometimes called a "pocket borough," was a borough or area that had a representative seat in Parliament but no longer really had much population in the borough.  People had moved to the cities in droves due to industrialization.  But as old parliamentary regions retained their representation in the House of Commons, their small electorate could be controlled by a small faction, or even by a single person.  That's where the term "pocket borough" came from, as a whole representative district was essentially "in the pocket" of a single powerful person or family in that district.  

Obviously all of that is bad for democracy.  Democratic processes work best when the people are represented fairly.  How boroughs for Parliament were drawn up, or how congressional districts for the US Congress are drawn up today, has an affect on how people are represented democratically.  In the USA today, we have a sort of similar problem in what are called "gerrymandered" districts.  Look up that term to learn more!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Compare and contrast the way abigail adams handled the role of first lady to the way that eleanor roosevelt approached it.
    12·2 answers
  • The first amendment can be described as
    15·2 answers
  • What are powers given to state and federal governments.
    11·1 answer
  • What caused the United States to enter World War II?<br><br> please need answer
    12·1 answer
  • What did wegener notice about fossils on different continents?
    6·1 answer
  • What’s being done to the brake fluid in the above photo?
    14·2 answers
  • Multiple Choice
    9·2 answers
  • What effect did the events mentioned above have on Mexican immigration to the United States?
    9·1 answer
  • Which roman emperor moved the empire’s capital to constantinople?.
    9·1 answer
  • Which type of drinks are served on Labor Day in America?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!