Answer if you only know
2 answers:
⇒ Based on the given rules of "Fire-Water-Sponge," outcomes 1<span>, </span>5<span>, and </span>8 are outcomes where you lose.
<span>Therefore, </span><span>1,5, and 8</span><span> are the subset of outcomes where you lose, and we now can say that the statements "The subset consists of all of the outcomes where your friend wins" and "The subset consists of all of the outcomes where you do not win, and there is not a tie" accurately describe the subset.
</span>
Furthermore, because every subset outcome involves you losing, the statements "The subset consists of all of the outcomes where you win" and "The subset consists of all of the outcomes where there is a tie" do not accurately describe the subset.
The statements that accurately describe the given subset of the sample space are:
<span>The subset consists of all of the outcomes where your friend wins.
</span><span> </span>The subset consists of all of the outcomes where you do not win and there is not a tie.
<span>Therefore, </span><span>1,5, and 8</span><span> are the subset of outcomes where you lose, and we now can say that the statements "The subset consists of all of the outcomes where your friend wins" and "The subset consists of all of the outcomes where you do not win, and there is not a tie" accurately describe the subset.
</span>
Furthermore, because every subset outcome involves you losing, the statements "The subset consists of all of the outcomes where you win" and "The subset consists of all of the outcomes where there is a tie" do not accurately describe the subset.
</span><span>
You might be interested in
Answer:
You would make a dotted vertical line running through -6 on the horizontal or x axis. The shading would go to the left side of the line since x is less than -6 and the line is dotted because it is only less than and not equal to.
Step-by-step explanation:
See image
