Answer:
Dred Scott v Sanford
Explanation:
In <u>Dred Scott v Sanford</u>, the Supreme Court justices determined that slaves were property and therefore had no legal rights.
In the Dred Scott v Sanford case, Dred Scott a black American who had lived an a territory were slavery had been banned sued for his freedom arguing that since he had lived in illinois and Wisconsin, both free territory, he was a free man. However, the court ruled that he was still a slave, the Supreme court corroborated the ruling of the lesser court that he was still a slave and therefore had no legal right and cannot sue.
C. Sentencing bc they have to know how long to punish the suspect
Answer: Relative poverty
Explanation:
Relative poverty is defined as poverty situation in which a person is not capable enough to earn for maintaining the basic living standards.Income of people is not markable to the amount for fulfilling the average standard living goods.
In this situation person might to able to afford the goods and standard that is below the standard living e.g.- unemployed people .This measure is usually used for measuring the poverty state in a country .
