Answer:
I don't think so
Explanation:
I believe that shouldn't be a thing because if you think about for an example if you american you have freedom if your hispanic you can not.Now if you think about the logic we have a lot of different bloods so it would not be fair there would be so many non free people because of ancestors.hope this makes sense lol
Answer:
what are the consequences of the character actions
Explanation:
however the character actions affect others is a sign of it having a impact on the way the plot goes
Answer:
I thought or love was full, but not finding those restless flames, which others said that it made their soul to plne, i thought the babes of pins hurt whined
Explanation:
Hi!
The correct options would be Direct Quotations and Paraphrasing.
Textual evidence refers to those lines or statements that substantiate a claim. In our case, while analyzing a literary piece, we can incorporate direct quotations, or paraphrase particular lines from the essay that support our argument or opinion.
Direct quotations are lines cited unaltered directly from the essay, and are incorporated between quotation marks. This is the most effective form of textual evidence.
Paraphrasing entails that the same idea, fact or message conveyed by the author in the essay are mentioned in the analysis in one's own words.
The thesis statement is clearly defines the topic of the analysis and all the textual evidence must be presented in a way to support it. It, itself, cannot be textual evidence.
The summary of the plot would be the brief account of the essay, and may not necessarily be as effective in proving a claim, and does not qualify as effective textual evidence when analyzing a literary essay.
Similarly the biography of the author may or may not relate to the literary essay, and is hardly used as textual evidence.
Hope this helps.
