1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sukhopar [10]
3 years ago
8

What did the Know-Nothings oppose? Why?

History
2 answers:
Sliva [168]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: The Know-Nothing party strongly opposed Immigrants and the Catholic Religion. This political party was a prominent one during the 1840s and early 1850s. They strongly opposed people who weren't Americans or believed the Catholic Religions beliefs.. Hoped that Helped ! ~ Feel free to Mark brainliest ~

Natali5045456 [20]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The American Party originated in 1849. Its members strongly opposed immigrants and followers of the Catholic Church. ... The Know-Nothings feared that the Catholics were more loyal to the Pope than to the United States.

You might be interested in
Why were colonies important to european mercantilism
qwelly [4]
Europeans bought manufactured goods to Africa in return for slaves.This is important because mercantilism is based on the idea that money is wealth.
8 0
3 years ago
To end its participation in World War I, Russia negotiated the_____ peace agreement. 1.declaration of neutrality 2. brest litovs
Alenkasestr [34]
The Brest-Litovsk peach agreement was signed by Soviet Russia and the Central Powers. It stated Russia's participation in World War II had ended and that the nation had no further intention of fighting.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Encounter occurred as a result of European
Kobotan [32]
The Encounter occurred as a result of European <span>explorers crossing the Atlantic Ocean, which famously introduced Europeans to the New World in the west. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Can defendant appeal again after florida supreme court<br> yes or no
Georgia [21]
Yes it can defended appeal against in court
3 0
2 years ago
Should the U.S. be able to restrict the rights of its' citizens during wartime? Why or why not? Us​
dezoksy [38]
This is a opinion based answer but there is 3 main answers to this question one is yes they should be able to take their rights away because us having the freedom to do anything can be dangerous for the government second is no they shouldn’t just because we are going into war doesn’t give them the rights to take our freedoms away because it could cause more problems within the way and the third is no they shouldn’t be able too unless their given a valid reason to take their right and then give an example
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Vicksburg is located on which river?
    8·2 answers
  • How was the social hierarchy of the Middle Ages an outgrowth of feudalism? PLEASE HELP!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Which department is responsible for managing relations with foreign countries?
    9·2 answers
  • Describe Hamilton's economic vision for the country. What was important to him?<br> PLEASE HELP ME
    5·2 answers
  • Explain the primary function of each of the branches of the federal government.
    8·1 answer
  • What did George Washington to during the French and Indian war
    8·1 answer
  • What was the Mandate of Heaven?
    15·1 answer
  • NEED HELP WITH THESE TWO QUICKKK 20 POINTS
    14·2 answers
  • Describe the major success and failures of Reconstruction. Evaluate the long-term results of Reconstruction for all Americans. E
    10·1 answer
  • What was the role for Family in Legalism
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!