Answer:
Yes, because there is diversity and decentralisation of power.
Explanation: The American society is a Democratic society which is made of different tiers and arm of Government which has different Power features.
Decentralisation of power is the process of Distribution of power both vertically(tiers of Government) and horizontally (arms of Government) with each having its own power as prescribed by the constitution.
DIVERSITY OF POWER IS A TERM THAT DISCRIBES THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF POWER AVAILABLE IT INCLUDES THE POWER TO MAKE LAWS(LEGISLATURE), THE POWER TO ENFORCE LAWS(EXECUTIVE) AND THE POWER TO INTERPRET LAWS(JUDICIARY) ETC.
Once a case reaches the Supreme Court, the The Supreme Court itself decides which cases it will hear.
The Supreme Court is asked to review more than 7,000 cases each year, so it would not be possible for the court to hear and make a decision on every case that is sent to it. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100 to 150 cases per year. The vast majority of those cases work their way up to the Supreme Court from lower courts. About two-thirds of the cases come from lower federal court decisions that are appealed for review, and about one-third of the cases are reviewing decisions made by supreme courts of individual states.
There are some cases that can have original jurisdiction at the Supreme Court level -- such as when there is a case between one state government and another or between state governments and the federal government. These are more rare within the overall agenda of the Court.
Answer:
c. Strong sentiments may be generated by a computer, not a person.
Explanation:
Computers do not have the capacity to generate sentiments or feelings, they are machines, sentiments are generated by humans.
Identifying the target of an expressed target is difficult in the scenarios pointed out in option A, B and D because a blog article may just be directed to the general public and not a particular individual or sect and sometimes there are actually multiple targets of a sentiment.
Canadian_Multiculturalism_Act<span>The Canadian Multiculturalism Act is a law, passed in 1988, that aims to preserve and enhance ... One result of this policy statement was the Canadian Multiculturalism Act (CMA) of 1988. The preamble ... Canadian law, as a result, reflects many of these rights and belief as they guaranteed to all men and women.</span>
Architecture for sure but I don’t know any more