Answer:
Move closer to in-group
Explanation:
It is believed according to social identity that behavior of individuals can be changed by organization if the organization can first modify the self-identity of the individuals. Hence, it claims that when people with different social identity are put together in a group, the we-group will mover closer to in-group others who perform more poorly than we do on an important task, when the group identity is salient.
Answer:
People's participation in election is usually measured by voter turnout figures. Turnout indicates the per cent of eligible voters who actually cast their vote. Over the last fifty years in India the turnout has either remained stable or actually gone up.
Answer:
This is an example of marginal analysis, as the decisions made by Raphael are on margin.
Explanation:
The decision of Raphael about pool versus bike time is totally a "how-much decision". It is clear that pool time and bike time can both reduce the time for race. However, the efficiency of pool time is high currently, and hence there is much sense in trying to spend more time in the pool and less on bike. This however makes no sense that all the time is spent in the pool and no time biking. Raphael only intends to alter the number of hours spend on each activity at the margin.