Optimize Risk Management is known to be as the risk which manage the risk actually through the Strategic Planning over a period of the time.
<h3>What is Opportunity Risk and Unexpected Risk ?</h3>
The Opportunity Risk and the Unexpected Risk are considered as the two important events which should be actually tracked and reported under a facility risk managements programs.
Hence, the Opportunity Risk occurs have always Positive effect on achievement of the various project objectives over a period of the time and Unexpected Risk occurs whenever there is a better Opportunity is becoming available in the Management
Learn more about Optimize Risk Management, here:
brainly.com/question/14020054
#SPJ1
Answer:
d. to better assign overhead costs to products
Explanation:
Activity-based costing is a method in which the overhead costs are assigned to the goods and this helps to create a relationship between the costs and the products to have a better understanding of the costs involved in the manufacturing process. According to this, the answer is that the best reason for using activity-based costing is to better assign overhead costs to products.
Answer: The answers are provided below
Explanation:
There are several similarities between the project management processes which surround scrum to the traditional project management processes which surrounds a project life cycle such as Waterfall. When one looks at each iteration as a project, one will see that Scrum planning meeting will be identical to planning meeting of the traditional project.
The daily standups in scrum will resemble the monitoring and the controlling of traditional waterfall with the exception that in scrum, its team monitors itself. A sprint would be the execution stage while the sprint review will be like project closure lessons that are learned. Sprint can be seen as small waterfall model project.
However, the main difference is in the scrum's team mindset versus the team of the traditional project management. Also, the process of work defining as being completed is different for the teams. Lastly, the method used by the scrum team in its approaches to work, team collaboration, responsibility acceptance, tasks definition and accountability are different from the traditional project management team.
A hybrid approach will be sensible in a large organization which has pockets of power. This is true for large retails that have old legacy systems in which frequent deployments aren't possible.
This is true for systems in which, testing can't be automated due to the fact that automated testing is a vital part for success for large scrum projects. In such organizations, it is sensible to use scrum for the teams which are able to move to scrum and waterfall can be used for other parts of the organization.
Answer:
Definitely
Explanation:
I 100% agree as circumstances differ and could affect the investment however it can be a way to generate lots of money.
