There are numerous likenesses and differences between religious conventions in this period. For instance, a few religions, for example, Hinduism were polytheistic while others, for example, Zoroastrianism were monotheistic. Confucius featured the significance of education, while Daoism was against it; some had their prophets or divinely guided figures (Confucius) while some did not (Hinduism). Nonetheless, they all had some composed record clarifying their thoughts; "analects", "vedas", "upanishads", and so forth. They all had a divine being from which they believe their religion originated, “God”.
Celeste was experiencing symptoms of withdrawal
I believe the answer is: A limited central government linking independent states
The confederate wants full authority to create their own laws without any possibilities for the central government to overrule it. By achieving this, they can set up their own rules regarding slavery and nothing that the abolitionists from the north can do to stop them.
In my honest opinion, I think that the Chinese government has no right to block off the rights to social media and possibly the internet. The internet is how we all connect to each other, see friends, learn about the world, basically get smarter and more aware. If the Chinese government takes away the right to the internet, the literacy rate will drastically drop, and business will slow down. China won't be considered a world super-power anymore, and American companies will dominate the industry scene instead of Chinese owned businesses. To close, if there is no social media in China, China will face the consequences.
